Does 'Victim Status' justify crime?

	posted by Adam on 06:00 PM June 18th, 2004
	CJ writes " A woman bites off her boyfriend's tongue and perhaps swallows it because he squeezed her a bit too tight while kissing. The AP news story granted her "victim status" on her account alone, which as usual is an odd twist of logic aimed at justifying violent female behavior based upon her previous experience with men. Media’s constant justification of violent female behavior seems to be the norm today and it softens the impact of violent female behavior, and denigrates men in the process. This was another "odds and ends" new item."

<  Nicole Kidman Movie Causing Outrage | All men are voles..?  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

"She had been victimized"?! (Score:1) by LSBeene on 02:36 AM June 19th, 2004 EST (#1) (User #1387 Info) And what if the boy friend had "been victimized" and bitten off HER tongue. 1.5 inches is a LOT of tissue to "mistakenly" bite off. And since it was during a sexual moment, it should be SEXUAL ASSAULT just had it been a man who bit hers. .... Right? Steven Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text

Re:"She had been victimized"?! (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 12:33 PM June 19th, 2004 EST (#2) It is RIDICULOUS! Men must take responsibility for their own wrong doings, AND men have to take responsibility for the wrong doings of WOMEN! (???!!??) ...'the hell...!?!   Thundercloud.   "Hoka hey!" A member of the outlaw gender.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]