[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Men Flex Political Muscle in California
posted by D on Thursday October 09, @11:29PM
from the blog dept.
News As you know Steve Imparl works with male depression. His great attitude is greatly appreciated at Men's Activism News Network. A major function of MANN is simply the activism. From time to time Steve will be sharing with us his views on Male Depression and its relation to us. Here is his latest journel in regards to California's recall vote. Read here and enjoy :).

Steve's Midlife Crisis: Men Flex Political Muscle in California Archives

October 09, 2003

Men Flex Political Muscle in California

Here we are, shortly after the big California recall election. Arnold “the Terminator” Schwarzenegger is the governor-elect of the Golden State. From a male perspective, the election has been interesting for at least three reasons.

First, California's recall election featured a prominent men's rights expert and advocate as a candidate. Dr. Warren Farrell campaigned on an innovative platform in which he called for a “Reformation” of the Democratic Party. His campaign emphasized practical solutions for men's issues and the benefit of families and children. I am grateful to Dr. Farrell for bringing those issues to the public debate in a once-in-a-lifetime election. I also congratulate him for running a fine campaign, focused on the issues, and totally free of the nasty mudslinging that we so often see in today's politics. I appreciate Dr. Farrell's work on behalf of men, and, by extension, on behalf of all people.

Second, male voters are getting attention as an electoral force to be reckoned with. Susan Faludi claimed that Arnold Schwarzenegger owed his election to “a lopsidedly male following.” In a sneering commentary in the Village Voice, James Ridgeway notes that “[t]he main force behind [Schwarzenegger] were macho men.” It also appears the male vote was decisive in approving the recall itself, and that more than half of Schwarzenegger's voters were men. The whining—and thoroughly predictable—Katha Pollitt moaned, "aggressive male chauvinism is back in style, and Mr. Schwarzenegger is its standard-bearer.”

Finally, the results of the election seem to suggest that voters will not be swayed by desperate, last-minute attempts to discredit a male candidate by claiming that he sexually harassed some women, with no opportunity to investigate or rebut the claims. Perhaps that is a sign of an electorate that is becoming more savvy about politcal gamesmanship. On the other hand, it could be a sign of an electorate that just doesn't care about the harm that individuals may have suffered. The latter possibility is unfortunate and frightening. Still, we might be seeing a case of political opportunists having “cried wolf” once too often.

In any event, the mainstream media may not be reporting on these male-significant implications of California's recall election. However, it is important to consider and discuss them because men are beginning to flex their political muscles. While we have a long way to go, we have taken the first steps toward a reformation. It may not be the precise reformation that Dr. Farrell sought in his campaign, but I think this election is a wake-up call for all men in the USA. Let's build on this foundation to make this world a better place for all beings.

Posted by Steve at 01:15 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

No Plans to Charge Ben Affleck's False Accuser | The sexist death penalty, sexual abuse, and homoph  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Dr Farrelle's votes (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Friday October 10, @12:44AM EST (#1)
Could someone give details on the percentage of votes for Dr Warren Farrell?

Thanx.
Re:Dr Farrelle's votes (Score:2)
by Dittohd on Friday October 10, @08:48PM EST (#2)
(User #1075 Info)
Are you sure you want to see them? Sure?

OK. You asked for it. Heeeeerrrrre they are.

By the way, remember Dr. Farrell wrote that a large number of votes for him even though he stated he had no chance of winning, would influence the winner to listen to us more in future legislation?

What does this mean since Larry Flynt came in 7th place with over 15K votes and Gary Coleman 8th place with almost 13K votes.

I wonder how many votes Dr. Farrell would have gotten if he had mustered the imagination to make himself newsworthy enough to just get covered on TV.

Dittohd

Re:Dr Farrelle's votes (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Monday October 13, @04:26AM EST (#5)
I tried it but the link does not work. From the tone of your reply, looks like the result is disappointing. But still, for the record, what's the score?
Re:Dr. Farrell's votes (Score:2)
by Dittohd on Monday October 20, @10:10PM EST (#6)
(User #1075 Info)
>But still, for the record, what's the score?

Arnold - 4,009,639 votes - 1st Place
Larry Flynt - 16,559 votes - 7th Place
Gary Coleman - 13,531 votes - 8th Place
Warren Farrell - 574 votes - 97th Place

Dittohd

P.S. Sorry for taking so long to reply but I wasn't rechecking my back comments for a while.

P.S. (Score:2)
by Dittohd on Friday October 10, @08:56PM EST (#3)
(User #1075 Info)
Anyone else here get the feeling that Dr. Farrell decided before he even started that he had no chance of winning and as a result, was playing with 99% of his brains tied behind his back?

Dittohd

Speaking of groping... (Score:2)
by HombreVIII on Friday October 10, @09:22PM EST (#4)
(User #160 Info)
After her concession speech, porn star Mary Carey gave interviewer Kennedy, (a woman), a hug and playfully grabbed her butt in the process. Yet I haven't heard anything from the media about her groping. Guess its just another case of "Its horrid and scary and significant when a man does it, but just innocent fun when a woman does"
[an error occurred while processing this directive]