|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will never understand why men in Canada still get married and willingly subject themselves to this misancdric, corrupt system of tyranny.
Of course men in the US are not much better off!
But the Canadian system of judicial oppression seems to have a distinct air of sadistic hatered against all men about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand either, Luek. These days, a man who marries anywhere in the West but in the U.S or Canada especially must either be unaware of the risks, exceptionally sure of his choice of mates, or arguably certifiable.
As long as the subject is Canada, I happened upon this article. It appears on the Fathers For Life website, and is a couple years old, but is a great read. Makes me glad I never married or had kids. Here is the link for the article:
http://www.fathersforlife.org/divorce/noway.htm
Freebird
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
" will never understand why men in Canada still get married and willingly subject themselves to this misancdric, corrupt system of tyranny."
Our mothers make us. And our fathers are just happy moms nagging someone else for a change.
:)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men still do it because they have hope.
They still do it because family is important.
They still do it because there is so much secrecy and clandestine activity in the government that they never hear about.
They know nothing of UN treaties that force elected governments to comply with treaty obligations.
Much of what has happened is the enshrinement of political correctness in law.
The family courts are above the law, they were designed that way.
These courts are designed to meet out punishment and obligation that could never weather the rigors of Criminal courts.
The treaties on human rights, that omnibus
creature, have grown enormously broad since they were first authored.
Look at the madness that has surrounded it.
*********************************************
From my post on MND
Women's rights [are] a symptom of the real problem. I am simply not an apologist for gender feminists.
May I direct your attention to the following completely psychotic insanity?
Introduction to the UN Human Rights Treaty System
The Goals
The primary aims of the treaty system are to:
encourage a culture of human rights
focus the human rights system on standards and obligations
engage all states in the treaty system
interpret the treaties through reporting and communications
identify benchmarks through general comments and recommendations
provide an accurate, pragmatic, quality end product in the form of
concluding observations for each state
provide a remedial forum for individual complaints
encourage a serious national process of review and reform through
partnerships at the national level
operationalize standards
mainstream human rights in the UN system and mobilize the UN community to
assist with implementation and the dissemination of the message of rights and obligations
The Standards
The human rights treaty system encompasses six major treaties:
the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination (in force 4 January 1969)
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR) (in force 23 March 1976)
the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (in force 23 March 1976)
the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (in force 3 September 1981)
the Convention Against Torture (in force 26 June 1987)
the Convention on the Rights of the Child (in force 2 September 1990).
The Treaty Bodies
The six treaties are associated with six treaty bodies which have the task of monitoring the implementation of treaty obligations. Five of the six treaty bodies meet primarily in Geneva, and are serviced by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). These are:
the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD)
the Human Rights Committee (HRC)
the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR)
the Committee Against Torture (CAT)
the Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC).
One treaty body meets in New York and is serviced by the UN Division for the Advancement of Women:
the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
The treaty bodies are composed of members who are elected by the states parties to each treaty (or through the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) in the case of CESCR). In principle, treaty members are elected as experts who are to perform their functions in an independent capacity.
The Functions of the Treaty Bodies
Meeting periodically throughout the year, the treaty bodies fulfill their monitoring function through one or more of three different methods.
First, all states parties are required by the treaties to produce state reports on the compliance of domestic standards and practices with treaty rights. These reports are reviewed at various intervals by the treaty bodies, normally in the presence of state representatives. Concluding observations, commenting on the adequacy of state compliance with treaty obligations, are issued by the treaty bodies following the review.
Second, in the case of four treaties individuals may complain of violations of their rights under the treaty (the Civil and Political Covenant, the Racial Discrimination Convention, the Convention Against Torture, and the Women's Discrimination Convention). These complaints are considered by the treaty body which expresses a view as to the presence or absence of a violation.
Third, in the case of CAT and CEDAW, their work includes another procedure. This is an inquiry procedure which provides for missions to states parties in the context of concerns about systematic or grave violations of treaty rights.
In addition, the treaty bodies contribute to the development and understanding of international human rights standards through the process of writing General Comments or Recommendations. These are commentaries on the nature of obligations associated with particular treaty rights and freedoms.
The National Level
Significantly, the international system has had implications at the national level. A multitude of domestic legal systems have been affected by the treaties. The treaties form the basis of a significant number of the world's bills of rights. There are also numerous instances of legal reform prompted by the treaties. Non-governmental organizations and national human rights institutions have invoked the treaty standards in relation to proposed government legislation and policies. Legislative committees have used treaty standards as reference points. The treaties have sometimes been incorporated into national law, had direct application through constitutional provisions to national law, and been used to interpret domestic law through judicial intervention
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
The Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
Optional Protocol to Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
The Convention Against Torture, and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
The Convention on The Rights of the Child
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflicts
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families
************************************************** ****************************
This is bureaucratic madness.
You can't view the culprit as feminism, lesbian activists, theism or any other single issue, because the problem is found in the multiculturalist ideology as well.
The omnibus nature of the definition of civil and human rights becomes itself a major obstacle to any kind of rational discourse on men's issues.
I have to emphasize this again, because I can't emphasize it enough!
The National Level
Significantly, the international system has had implications at the national level. A multitude of domestic legal systems have been affected by the treaties. The treaties form the basis of a significant number of the world's bills of rights. There are also numerous instances of legal reform prompted by the treaties.
Non-governmental organizations and national human rights institutions have invoked the treaty standards in relation to proposed government legislation and policies. Legislative committees have used treaty standards as reference points.
The treaties have sometimes been incorporated into national law, had direct application through constitutional provisions to national law, and been used to interpret domestic law through judicial intervention
You need to have a look at the contributions that your own country has made to this mess as well.
IMHO
Men's News Daily needs someone with a political science background to look at this mess for the record from a disciplined perspective.
respectfully,------------------------------------- -------------
Donald Cameron
Amateur At Large
Unit 205 - 89 King Street West
Dundas, Ontario, Canada L9H 1V1
Phone 905-627-2673
http://www.AmateurAtLarge.com
dwc@amateuratlarge.com
----
Donald Cameron
Amateur At Large
Dundas, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
