Could it be?

	posted by Adam on Thursday June 19, @02:17PM from the Well.... dept.
	The Gonzo Kid writes "At this link , it appears that Australia has a proposal to make shared custody the default in divorce cases. Predictably, we have the femboy naysayers like Patrick Parkinson, a family law professor at the University of Sydney, who says, "It only really works when the parents can get along with each other." Hey, Pat! Ever consider that in that case the parent who refuses to get along - FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILD - shouldn't get custody? Oh, but that would usually be the woman, wouldn't it? And that would go against your collosal suck-up to the Pheminists, wouldn't it?"

<  Fiebert's DV studies | Chid Support Changes in Michigan  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Good Point. (Score:1) by Dittohd on Friday June 20, @03:59AM EST (#1) (User #1075 Info) We are definitely making progress. I agree with your point that a woman should not have primary custody of the children if she can't get along with her ex for short periods of time for the sake of the children. I would go a step further and say that in most cases, both parents should have 50/50 custody and child support should be done away with, except for the sharing of unforeseen emergency expenses. Dittohd

[an error occurred while processing this directive]