|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They're only boys. And as everyone knows, males are merely things, not people.
Just ask any pheminut.
---- Burn, Baby, Burn ----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if, in these days of zero tolerance, there might be enough evidence in the book to charge her with pedophilia.
Well, I can dream, can't I?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems like what we are facing is the extreme criminalization of all male exertion of sexuality.
At the same time we see the media's frontal assault on our collective minds in seeing all female's exertion of sexuality to be socially acceptable. Meaning not criminal either.
By the very definition is what they complain about the Taliban they are trying to do to American Men.
How long before we are all in prison?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday February 10, @01:16AM EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
((("How long before we are all in prison?")))
Dan.
Well, the fact that the fem-bots are trying (and succeeding)to make the very state of being male a "crime", I'd say we'll all be in prison in the next 20, or maybe 30 years.
And yeah, It's funny isn't it? If a man has sex with an underage girl, he's a paedophile, and a rapist!
But a woman who has sex with an under age boy is "sexualy liberated."
It must be nice to be the 'un-accountable gender.'
Hmm, Kind of like diplomatic immunity, based on gender...,
Thundercloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday February 15, @11:33PM EST (#12)
|
|
|
|
|
My suggestion is to kill Germaine Greer. If one of those feminists bitches molests my Sons or Grandsons I would kill her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Wednesday February 05, @12:10AM EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
The article stated:
"Fifty years ago, if a dad heard about a teacher having sex with his son, he would go over to the teacher's house and tell her to knock that crap off," Milwaukee defense attorney Robert G. LeBell said. "It wouldn't even be referred to the police. Today, society's attitude has definitely changed."
My reply:
They thought this day would never come. Radical Feminists have sown the wind, and only NOW are they starting to reap the whirlwind. If they are looking for any mercy for their gender from the tortured, tormented, abused, and suicidal souls of men, that they have driven to the bounds of sheer hopelessness, then they had best think again. This story about women being measured by the same standard that has been applied so Draconianly to men makes my day, and if I could add but one exhortation to this measure of justice that has been meted out to these molesters of young men it would simply be this, "Pour it one, I have not yet begun to feel appeasement for the injustices that I have suffered at the hands of the radical feminist tyranny." Yes, that is my attitude and it will be a long, long, long time before it ever changes back to anything even remotely resembling that happy go lucky kid who just wanted to love the opposite sex and be loved in return.
Sincerely, Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That noone is really conserned about this book shows that there is a double standard. A woman's love of children is pure and is inherantly considered unsexual until proven otherwise. Until proven otherwise a man's love of a child is in doubt. What pisses me off about this is that a woman admiring a child is considered natural while a male admiring a child is unnatural/immoral.
Tony
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the problem is that the book seems not to be released yet, unless I misunderstood. Oh, I'm sure it won't generate as much outrage as the recent Michael Jackson interview, but at least if you have a copy in your hand, your complaints are a little more credible.
There are many organizations around that claim to work against child sexual assault, and they're all very local. You can go to their office and see the executive director (or whatever) in person. Perhaps the way to deal with this is for someone in every state to go to their local "branch office" with a copy of the book and demand that the group take a stand against it. They're all so enthralled with the notion of protecting their children from men that they might be shocked to realize that there are female predators out there, too, Greer and her disciples being among them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon reading this story I told my good friends at www.antichildporn.org (where I am a webmaster) and we have begun to dive into the matter. Sofar we have only put the link up at the main page, but we will do more about this.
We will investigate this new book and will fight it if it will contains what we all fear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good. I'd love to see this arrogant bitch deboned and fileted in the criminal courts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'd like to reclaim for women the right to appreciate the short-lived beauty of boys - real boys, not simpering 30-year-olds with shaved chests."
We can all imagine the riots if the gender-roles were reversed here. However, from the simple fact that she's after male children, it's clear that this not only follows the typical pattern of feminst hypocrisy, but also, given her attraction to males who resemble women, this woman's probably a repressed homosexual in addition to a pedophile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imagine the following:
Greer focused on young girls
January 23, 2003
NAMGLA icon Gerald Greer expects to be branded a paedophile after writing a new book challenging conventional views on child pornography.
Greer, 63, says The Girl, which looks at female children in Western art, is about reclaiming the right of men to enjoy the beauty of girls.
"Everyone thinks the only people who like looking at pictures of girls - and I mean girls, not women - are perverts, but that's not true. I, for one, love looking at them," Greer told British newspaper the Daily Express.
"I'll be called a paedophile after this."
Greer, who set the tone of gender politics in the 1970s with "Thank Heaven for Little Girls" and went on to attack "thirty-something males" and fainthearted child-lovers in later works, expects The Girl to create controversy.
"It's going to get me in a lot of trouble," he said.
"I just can't let it go. Working on it has been the best fun in the world, because it is a book of pictures of ravishing girls.
"I'd like to reclaim for men the right to appreciate the short-lived beauty of girls - real boys, not simpering 30-year-olds with sagging chests.
"The snag is that everywhere I turn I find new pictures of outrageously lovely girls and it's too late to get them into the book but I keep downloading them, scanning them and printing them, just in case and just for fun."
There is no immediate publication date.
AAP
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
