This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I call it "feminists cluedo". In ordinary cluedo,you only have to find out who actually did it and you've won. In feminist cluedo, you have to find out who is "responsible", often not the person who actually did it. The rules for determining who is responsible are quite simple. (1) If a man did it, he is totally and completely responsible. (He is not allowed any defence of mental aberration or emotional upset of any sort.) (2) If a man and a woman did it, he is totally and completely responsible. (She then operates as under rule 3). (3) if a woman did it, she is totally and completely NOT responsible for one of the following reasons (a) If there is a man involved, he is responsible (Note no evidence, other than her word, on involvement required) (b) If there is a man in the vicinity, he is responsible (c) If a man has upset her, he is responsible (Again no evidence required) or (d) If no man can be found, no-one is responsible (It's a tragic accident/She was upset/depressed)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) If no man can be found, no-one is responsible (It's a tragic accident/She was upset/depressed)
If no man can be found, isn't it the fault of the patriarchy? :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If no man can be found, isn't it the fault of the patriarchy? :)
ROFL!!! Love it!!
I should know that it's human nature to blame the other guy. And, since, in feminist viewpoint, men are the malevolent "other guy", there MUST be some way to blame them. Either that or they use the popular excuse of "it was my hormones!"
Maybe proof that they want to think with their vaginas, after all??
Learning to Adjust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
" Either that or they use the popular excuse of "it was my hormones!"
How many 'female only' defences are there now? Say 35 or 40 different ones, come on what's your best ballpark guess?
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|