[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Blaming Men For The Crimes Of Women
posted by Thomas on Wednesday July 03, @12:32PM
from the False-Accusations dept.
False Accusations This essay by Glenn Sacks covers a matter that we've recently discussed, but I think it's worth giving Glenn a prominent spot in this case. It's more of the same: A woman commits a crime, an effort begins to determine which man or men can be blamed.

Source: Men's News Daily

Title: Colorado Arsonist Terry Barton's Smart Strategy: When in Trouble, Blame a Man

Author: Glenn J. Sacks

Date: July 3, 2002

Should False Accusers Be Named (And Prosecuted)? | MensMovement.org Launches Today  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Feminist Cluedo (Score:1)
by Raymond Cuttill on Wednesday July 03, @05:45PM EST (#1)
(User #266 Info)
I call it "feminists cluedo". In ordinary cluedo,you only have to find out who actually did it and you've won. In feminist cluedo, you have to find out who is "responsible", often not the person who actually did it. The rules for determining who is responsible are quite simple. (1) If a man did it, he is totally and completely responsible. (He is not allowed any defence of mental aberration or emotional upset of any sort.) (2) If a man and a woman did it, he is totally and completely responsible. (She then operates as under rule 3). (3) if a woman did it, she is totally and completely NOT responsible for one of the following reasons (a) If there is a man involved, he is responsible (Note no evidence, other than her word, on involvement required) (b) If there is a man in the vicinity, he is responsible (c) If a man has upset her, he is responsible (Again no evidence required) or (d) If no man can be found, no-one is responsible (It's a tragic accident/She was upset/depressed)
Re:Feminist Cluedo (Score:2)
by Thomas on Wednesday July 03, @06:00PM EST (#2)
(User #280 Info)
(d) If no man can be found, no-one is responsible (It's a tragic accident/She was upset/depressed)

If no man can be found, isn't it the fault of the patriarchy? :)
Re:Feminist Cluedo (Score:1)
by LadyRivka (abrouty@wells.edu) on Wednesday July 03, @11:54PM EST (#3)
(User #552 Info) http://devoted.to/jinzouningen
If no man can be found, isn't it the fault of the patriarchy? :)

ROFL!!! Love it!!

I should know that it's human nature to blame the other guy. And, since, in feminist viewpoint, men are the malevolent "other guy", there MUST be some way to blame them. Either that or they use the popular excuse of "it was my hormones!"

Maybe proof that they want to think with their vaginas, after all??

Learning to Adjust.
Re:Feminist Cluedo (Score:1)
by Dan Lynch (dan047@sympatico.ca) on Thursday July 04, @12:07AM EST (#4)
(User #722 Info)
" Either that or they use the popular excuse of "it was my hormones!"

How many 'female only' defences are there now? Say 35 or 40 different ones, come on what's your best ballpark guess?
.
Dan Lynch
[an error occurred while processing this directive]