This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's worth mentioning here that the SIDS scare first began to be an issue because of a mother who had smothered each of her five babies over the course of several years. These cases were used in beginning the research until it surfaced many years later that she had killed them.
Another significant aspect is something we almost take for granted - immunizations of infants. In Japan they ran an experiment whereby they delayed the DPT immunization (typically done at about two months) until two years of age. SIDS disappeared almost overnight! But guess what did happen? There was a glut of new health problems among two year olds. We are giving newborns adult dosages of vaccines which become part of their genetic material, and the reporting of adverse side effects is wholly insufficient.
For example when my son had an extreme reaction to his DPT shot they told me it was nothing. When the reaction continued for a solid week, and I called back, they said it was past the time for it to be linked to the vaccination. The problem here is obvious. If a child dies of SIDS a week later, it doesn't count. Even though the Japan results speak for themselves.
In any case the vaccinations throughout the first two years denied my son a lot of sleep (and sleep is when the synapses connect in infants which led to him being somewhat developmentally delayed) and suddenly he developed food sensitivities when he had been fine prior. He had to be on goat's milk for two years. (Yuck)
Didn't mean to get too off-topic here - anyway SIDS is rather suspect, IMO. Breast-fed babies who sleep with their mothers have the lowest risk of SIDS. Just thought I'd throw that in :)
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|