Wisconsin High Court Orders Man Not to Father Children

	posted by Nightmist on Wednesday July 11, @09:08PM from the reproductive-rights dept.
	A four-man and three-woman Wisconsin high court in this story from Excite News has banned a man from having any more children while he is on probation for not paying $25,000 in child support. The decision was split along gender lines. The three female justices said that the ban denied the man his basic human (and Constitutional) right to father a child. The four male justices said the ban forced the man "to consider responsibility." The female justices and the man's lawyer expressed concern that such action could lead to the trampling of the rights of men who cannot afford child support.

<  DesertLight Journal No. 7 | Male Pill Being Tested in Britain  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Un-Fair Sex (Score:1) by Spartacus on Monday July 16, @05:30PM EST (#1) (User #154 Info) Isn't that something? In a time of rampant feminism, when men are told they are the selfish ones, it is the female [sic] Justices that vote in favor of self interest ("rights") and the male Justices who reject self interest in favor of responsibility to others. "When women hold the helm of government, the state is at once in jeopardy, because women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality but by arbitrary opinions and inclinations." p. 263-4 Hegel. "Philosophy of Right". Translated by T.M. Knox, Clarendon Press, 1952

[an error occurred while processing this directive]