Proposed Harassment Policy Divides GWU

	posted by Scott on Saturday April 28, @02:48PM from the false-accusations dept.
	frank h submitted this article from the Washington Times. The article discusses a new controversial sexual harassment policy being drafted at George Washington University, which says that "faculty members accused of sexual harassment would not be told the identity of the accuser or the specific charges against them...teachers could be charged with sexual harassment if something they say in class can be construed as such." Frank writes "Again, we see that men are no longer afforded protection under the Fourteenth Amendment." Well, I'm hoping that since the faculty are the ones up in arms, that something will actually be done to stop this. The lack of student outrage about Columbia's rape policy is more than a bit disturbing.

<  Columbia Student Speaks Out Against Rape Hysteria | Book Review: Domestic Tranquility  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sexual Harassment Policy (Score:1) by Spartacus on Saturday April 28, @05:03PM EST (#1) (User #154 Info) "Under the administrationīs policy, opponents say, faculty members accused of sexual harassment would not be told the identity of the accuser or the specific charges against them." From the article in question. "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him." Amendment VI, Constitution of the United States. "American public opinion has become largely feminine and its profound impact on the political evolution of the United States can never be overestimated. The disintegration of republican institutions geared to a more patriarchal age and the steady march toward Caesarism are largely their doing.." Amaury de Riencort http://www.jps.net/tpoll/riencort.htm Tom Pollock (Spartacus)

[an error occurred while processing this directive]