This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
The disdain for men just oozes out of this one doesn't it? The solution has to come from the "male lobby" because "we" (presumably feminists) don't want to "undermine" all of the work "we" did "for women". Cheap, transparent rationalization. How thoughtful.
I suppose I'm like a 70's feminist when I read these pieces: I'm always struck by the irony of a news outlet that thinks that in order to discuss the crime of rape against males they need a female interviewer and a female psychologist. A long time ago I remember that all scientists were men, and women complained bitterly that the only people on TV talking about rape, PMS, PPD, and other female complaints were men interviewing other men. Quite rightly the women pointed out that these men, no matter how well-meaning, always seemed to talk about women as though they were an interesting species of lab rat.
What about these two women? They talk about male rape victims as an interesting phenomenon, not as people.
A trivial article, but as you said Scott: it's good to see someone at least mentioning the subject.
|
|
 |
 |
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|