This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I mentioned the "new" Choice4Men e-mail list, which is moderated, but also want to let everyone know of the original one, which details can be found at the www.choiceformen.com web site.
I personally subscribe to both.
Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by The Ox
(oxfordsystems@removetoreply.usa.net)
on Thursday October 19, @08:15PM EST (#2)
(User #79 Info)
|
|
|
|
|
I will have to disagree on the Salon article by Cathy Young. I thought that it was a masterful piece of work in strong support of Choice4Men and that it went to great lengths to point out the hypocrisy of arguements that run counter to the simmering movement.
Ms. Young stated some of the obstacles to favorbale rulings and in light of what we know from past experience I think she was spot on. It shouldn't be viewed as discouraging but instead as a statement of the challenge that we face. It will take many more getting involved over a long period of time to effect the sort of sea change of opinion required to gain the favor of lawmakers and the courts.
As to the lists, your efforts in "bending over backwards" to be fair are commendable. One point for those who are considering joining one or both lists to take into account is that the E-Groups list is moderated. Moderated does not equate with censored. It equates on an on topic forum without petty personal attacks or agendas. All are welcome to join and participate with no approval required.
Support Choice4Men
http://www.egroups.com/group/choice4men
http://www.nas.com/c4m/
The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|