Trial by jury – the light that exposes feminist lies

Article here. Excerpt:

'This latest call demonstrates yet again just how tyrannical feminism has become in this era of #MeToo. For the last year there has been a relentless attack on the presumption of innocence, and now we see jury trial itself is on the chopping block. It seems that feminism is incompatible with Enlightenment values such the presumption of innocence and trial by jury.

We see this when the presumption of innocence and due process are now dismissed as ‘reactionary’. When Senator Susan Collins said Justice Brett Kavanaugh was entitled to due process, the Women’s March tweeted out a picture of her calling her a ‘rape apologist’. She received death threats thereafter. Can you think of anything more disgusting than being labelled a rape apologist? This is the choice feminism gives us: you either care about due process or you care about victims of rape. It is an appalling way to debate these issues.

The reason why feminist don’t like jury trials is because the damn jurors, not marinated in feminist twaddle, do not convict in rape cases every single time. This is just not good enough for the likes of Baroness Kennedy who believes ‘lawyers and the courts [have] a responsibility to give women their rights’ and that some judges would assume that a woman using dating sites is ‘someone who would have sex with anyone’. The good Baroness offers no evidence for this slanderous attack on the most impartial judges in the world.'