Home

'Civil and Human Rights Coalition Calls Republican VAWA Proposal “Nothing Less than Shameful”'

Matt - Wed, 2013-02-27 03:26

Article here. Excerpt:

'"The determination of the House Republican leadership to block an inclusive, bipartisan Violence Against Women Act in favor of a narrow partisan bill that fails to protect all victims of domestic violence is nothing less than shameful.
...
Even in today’s polarized political climate, we should at least be able to agree that when we send our daughters and sons to college, they should be protected from stalking, violence, date rape, and sexual assault; that one-third of tribal women who have been the victims of rape or domestic abuse should have equal access to justice no matter where the perpetrator lives; and that domestic violence is still violence regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation. The House should stop holding victims hostage.

It’s time for the House to stop playing politics with victims’ lives and pass the Senate version of VAWA.”'

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Replies

Matt - Wed, 2013-02-27 03:36

SAVE: "For Many, VAWA is a Deadly Proposition": http://www.saveservices.org/2013/02/the-violence-against-women-act-is-a-deadly-proposition/

Independent Women’s Forum: "VAWA: What you Need to Know": http://www.iwf.org/publications/2790645/The-Violence-Against-Women-Act

 

»

Gender feminism is a hate movement

MR - Wed, 2013-02-27 06:08

As shown in Witch-Hunting Males at Youtube, the witch-hunting of males is institutionalized and enshrined into law by American government through the Violence Against Women Act. It’s absolutely sickening that government under VAWA has become such a despicable cover for a misandrist hate movement like gender feminist ideology.

»

Understanding the title of the law

usfspa2012 - Thu, 2013-02-28 00:26

The title itself should give credence to the civil and human rights violation created by vaWa. The law specifically states that it will protect WOMEN from violence. There is no mention of men being protected other than men who are gay. This in it of itself should be shameful.

Equal does not mean equal to feminist. The mind of a feminist is upside down, backwards and inside out. If men have 1 and women have 3, then it's almost equal. She needs his 1, for her it to be truly equal.

One feminist put it this way:

We want to be able to do, be, and have all of the privileges of men. I want to be that man who has it all...Men are monsters!

I take this as she wants to be that monster but won't put forth the effort to gain that privilege so she thinks claiming abuse and unfairness will suffice for the hard work the man has done to gain his privilege.

»