|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Thundercloud on 12:53 PM June 29th, 2006 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
I have been noticing, lately that this is being done more and more frequently. Where they take a great man (like Einstein) and transfer the credit for what the man did or discovers to some woman.
This is all part of the feminists efforts to re-write history. So that it is women not men who are credited with genius and/or accomplishments.
Now, of course WOMEN that have made discoveries or done great things, no one will ever say that it was really a MAN who deserves the credit, because no MAN could ever be so clever. That is what the feminists believe. I mean, after all if the media has taught women anything it is that ALL men are nothing but bumbling buffoons who can't even figure out how to work the stove. (Incidentally THAT was invented by a man, too.)
The feminists do this (transfer credit from male to female) because they WANT it to be true. They can not deal with reality. Especially a reality where men can and do often out preform women in technology, science, the arts, and are more likely than females to be born with some sort of genius or another. The feminists know the old adage; 'Tell a lie often enough and it will become a truth believed.' And make no mistake about it, this is EXACTLY what they are attempting to do.
I honestly do see a day where our history books will credit women and women only with doing great things. Even if it was really a man that did it.
We're already seeing it.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by JulianDroms on 02:45 PM June 29th, 2006 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Fully debunked here:
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/4/2/1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by JM on 03:55 PM June 29th, 2006 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
Feminists have been using this simple trick for at least thirty years. It now comes mainly from the university political cells (women’s Studies) All you do is stick a pin in the history book containing the names of great men. Then you look for the nearest female and name her as a great woman who had her work stolen by that man.
However, in 2006 there are big differences:
They now have a massive propaganda infrastructure in place, which encompasses just about everything you could think of. This infrastructure feeds lies directly to the sheeple via the media. These sheeple have long ago been trained by simple social engineering tricks to accept any lies about men as the truth.
Feminists now have a massive amount of cash at their disposal to fund this type of propaganda. Propaganda flicks like this cost money and there are always neutered males around to do the real work.
These pathetic males will trash their brothers for a few dollars (or even just for the approval of a female)
Feminists can now throw large amounts of (usually taxpayers) money at anything they choose.
They now have an unlimited amount of time to do these things because many feminists now receive their wages from the taxpayers (government jobs or similar large bureaucracy jobs) They spend as little time as possible on the actual job – most of their time is spent on organizing future political attacks on men, children, the family and happy heterosexual women.
Because of these things, this type of propaganda will probably become much more common and much more effective in the future.
It seems feminists have learned well from Orwell’s 1984. This is exactly what the party members at the Ministry of Propaganda did (in Orwell’s book). They rewrote history with whatever lies suited their current political purpose.
They called themselves: The Ministry of Truth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by mcc99 on 05:05 PM June 29th, 2006 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm, note the date of the posting of that article: April 2004... two years ago! So, this is not PBS's first airing of this program. I'll bet it was criticized heavily back then and so they decided to wait a couple of years to re-air it. Guess if you tell a lie often enough, eventually, they figure, people will believe it! Alas, they are probably right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by bull on 05:15 PM June 29th, 2006 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
The reason preeminent philosophers, scientists, and artists have and continue to be largely males is because most females are incapable of original thought. Instead, they latch onto an outside idea and run with it like so many sheep. This is what fuels the radical feminist movement; a few chronically malcontent lesbian leaders programming weak-minded followers into believing the hogwash their movement comes up with. It doesn’t surprise me that they are now trying to capitalize off the accomplishments of great men in history. I suppose it’s validating to those who can not create on their own?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Roy on 10:17 PM June 29th, 2006 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever original thoughts women might have been capable of are being extinguished by their addiction to the CELL PHONE.
The average female has to yammer out 40,000 words per day just to keep from going on a murderous rampage.
She HAS TO TALK INCESSANTLY for most of her waking time just to feel "normal."
The content of her yammering is irrelevant, and in most cases, there is no content, if you're looking for ideas, philosophy, current events, politics, etc.
The average modern American female cannot be silent -- unyammering -- for more than 90 seconds.
Do your own test. Just observe and make mental notes.
Wonder why there are no significant female philosophers?
Because you have to shut up once in a while if you want to write down your lofty thoughts.
Also, they have no lofty thoughts, as is typical of all parasitical species.
Their focus is forever on what they can harvest from their hosts, anything more ambitious is an abstraction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Thundercloud on 11:29 AM June 30th, 2006 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
It has also been my experience that women "talk too much", as well.
I used to think I was being biased, but the more I've studied women the more I saw that I was not.
One personal example is the difference when I'm with male family members and female family members. When I am with my Dad, for instance, there are long periods of time that go by with out either of us saying a word. A half hour to even an hour may go by before one of us speaks. And when we do speak it is usually about something specific.
Now, when I'm with my Mom, she seems to need to say something every 15 seconds or so. I usually just nod or say; "Uh-huh", in response.
The same is true with my sister. She just can't go for more than 20 seconds without saying SOMEthing.
And then there are my public observations of men and women. Most men that I see in groups also talk amongst themselves in spurts. But most groups of women I see talk almost non-stop. Also, I have noticed that women often talk louder and cackle, where as with the men the tone is more subdued, and they don't let the whole room in on their conversation.
Something else that drives me nuts. Have you ever noticed that when, in public, you are having a private conversation with someone there are times when a woman will just out of the blue insinuate herself in to your conversation?
I know they are probably just trying to be nice, but it really BUGS me.
I have found that Black women tend to talk and cackle the loudest, followed by White women, followed by Hispanic women, Then American Indian women. The quietest women tend to be Asian, Hindu and Muslim. (Which is probably why they are the only women I tend to get along with)
A lot of you probably expected me to say that American Indian women are among the women who are the quietest. Forget the stereotypes. An Indian woman will often talk your ear off as much as any Black or White woman will. My Dad is White, and my Mom is Cherokee. Dad isn't a big talker (and despite my wordy posts, I'm not either) but my Mother and Sister, (Both Indian women) they are quite talkative.
This is not some diatribe against women. There is probably a reason that women talk so much. It may be social, emotional or psychological, I don't know. But it is just their natural way, and I guess that's okay.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by AngryMan
(end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk)
on 11:39 AM June 30th, 2006 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
Nice website. Someone obviously spent money on it. Have you seen the ready-made lesson plans for teachers? "This section of the Einstein's Wife Web site offers three lesson plans, designed for science and social studies classes... Learning investigations are centered on: the personal life history of Mileva Maric Einstein; a comparison of the lives and careers of Marie Curie and Mileva Maric; and an examination of socio-historical restrictions on women. "
Teachers tend to be busy, often under pressure, and almost all female. If you offer them ready-made materials, a lot of them will take it. This is one of the ways in which the feminist propaganda machine operates. Ready-made stories for journalists, ready-made lesson plans for teachers. They get other people to propagate their distortions for them. A science lesson about the personal life history of Mileva Einstein or 'socio-historical restrictions on women'? What kind of crap is that? Science lessons are for teaching science.
Our education system is being turned into a feminist brain-washing camp.
"Those who promise us paradise on earth have never produced anything but hell." Karl Popper
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
Last night on the local public TV station, I saw