|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 08:37 AM December 5th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
All my life I have spoken out about the abuse that I received by my Mothers hands, and her mind. Whenever I mentioned this around an older Woman, I was scolded, "Don't you talk about your Mother that way!" I of course then preceeded to enlighten that particular Woman as to their "business", and it was my Mother, and I can say anything I want as long as it is true. MY POINT IS SIMPLE, WE CANNOT DISCOUNT THE TRAINING WE HAVE RECEIVED IN LIFE. Most of us know this in our hearts, but we haven't been able to articulate it without being chastised. I am glad to see people having the courage to speak the truth, which I have done all my life, and it has always been a battle. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK! PLEASE.......................
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 09:04 AM December 5th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
As an after thought, we should lobby to have the Sociological Fields changed to a "hard science". Why?, because the abuse of that knowledge has been a bane on the lives of People since it was learned. By discounting its' affect, they get to play with theories while we suffer under their manipulations. BREAKING THE SCIENCE IS WONDERFUL, I am adding it to my tool bar post haste!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Thundercloud on 10:32 AM December 6th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it interesting how much feminism is like Communism?
Both "systems" forbid criticism of a particular person or people. And in both there is a "punishment" for breaking that "law".
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 09:36 PM December 6th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
Communism is another form of dictatorship as we have seen in our own lifetime. I am a Humanist, and deplore most of the modern forms of control as they pander to the elite. I believe that control should be from the bottom up, not the other way around. But then again that is just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by RandomMan on 05:33 PM December 8th, 2005 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
Modern "feminism" is communism. No ifs, ands or buts about it. The class warfare simply involves gender rather than economics, although control over power and economics are of course the real goals of any so-called "communist". In order to make feminism fly again, they had to attach the wings of victimhood to create an "oppressed" class (women), which should then overthrow the "ruling" or "oppressor" class (men). Hence the narcissistic and invariable feminist obsession with maintaining their status as victims, regardless of objective, relevant evidence to the contrary.
Betty Friedan, who wrote The Feminine Mystique and kicked off this whole 40-year reign of error was a well known communist, and active in the leadership of the American communist party. Her entire representation of herself as a poor, suffering, oppressed housewife was a myth, a self-serving lie, because like any propagandist, she knew that an unpopular political affiliation would sink her.
Feminism is communism. Period. Read Animal Farm for a nice, quick summary of how revolutionary socialism really works, if you want to skip ahead to the ending the pigs are looking for. What feminists forget is that revolutionary socialism/communism is an endless cycle unless a police state is created to stop it, which is exactly what happened in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, Vietnam, Cuba, and so on. And it's exactly what the feminists are trying to establish now, because they know that soon we'll be able to use their own tactics to complete another "revolutionary" cycle and bounce their fat, hairy asses out of power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"NNEDV Viewer's Guide:
“Three million to 10 million children witness abuse each year in their homes."
Gosh, such painstakingly accurate science !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by bull on 02:44 AM December 6th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
NNTEDV's Viewers Guide states "Research shows that “while women are less likely than men to be victims of violent crimes overall, women are five to eight times more likely than men to be victimized by an intimate partner.” (U.S. Department of Justice, Violence by Intimates: Analysis of Data on Crimes by Current or Former Spouses, Boyfriends, and Girlfriends, March 1998)." Men are far more likely to be arrested, even if they are the victim, in domestic violence police calls. Justice Department statistics have got to be the most unscientific measure of what's really going on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 09:43 PM December 6th, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and even on this site there have been disclosures of people telling that they as Police Officers have been ordered to arrest the Male regardless of the circumstances in a domestic disturbance, that is how they got those statistics. Manipulation of the facts to implement actions to oppress. I fail to understand how anyone could see our government as responsible to the People in light of situations like these. Police Officers have also been told not to document uses of firearms by responsible Citizens, same game, same goal, different situation, I wonder what they will lie about next?
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
Dittohd writes "