[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Child support payments upheld by high court
posted by Matt on 07:24 PM November 10th, 2005
Divorce Garth writes "The Supreme Court of Canada has decided that divorced parents can't necessarily get their child support payments reduced just because they start taking more care of their children. What is most interesting about this article are the reader responses at the bottom, which are universally opposed to the decision. It is obvious that there are a large number of people opposed to the current trend of governmental and judicial stupidity. Will politicians ever take notice, change their stance to be more sane and reasonable, and reap a windfall of votes from bitter parents?"

<  RADAR Turns the Tide on Domestic Violence | Warren Farrell on NBC Nightly News Tonight  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The feminist's pet court speaks (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 04:04 AM November 11th, 2005 EST (#1)
Each case must be dealt with individually, the Supreme Court said. There should be "emphasis on flexibility and fairness to ensure that the economic reality and particular circumstances of each family are properly accounted for," the ruling said.

Yeah, right.

Let me translate what the feminist's pet court said: "We reserve the right to screw each and every man over, at any time, at his expense, so even if the kids reside with him full time and he's unemployed, the male oppressor will still be paying child support".

And gee, and what a surprise, the last two "justices" appointed were both radical feminists, including the chief "justice". I can only hope that this pathetic, frozen toilet of a country sinks to the bottom of the ocean under the weight of its own bullshit sometime soon, because there's no other way a man's going to get a fair shot in Canada before then.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]