|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:41 AM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
"Frey's attorney, Gloria Allred, said Wednesday that her client never intended to deceive [Anthony] Flores."
Only a mentally retarded individual would believe such a lie.
And are you kidding me!?!? This is the bitch that sent Peterson to jail on little more than rumor?
I cannot believe how the public bought into the innocent Christian bitch victim lie. She knew Scott was married and deliberately harmed Scott’s wife by helping him cheat. Now it turns out that she has committed paternity fraud?
If anybody had a clue how really serious it is to damage a child with paternity fraud then they would take her child away for severe abuse and throw the bitch in jail.
But no. Women in America get to kill children and men while getting a raise at work. Makes really good sense. Kill a man or child and get a raise!
Today American women routinely abuse a child with paternity fraud and the man is at fault. Who pays? The child and the man.
Bitch.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There does appear to be a pattern emerging with this woman. Just based on the one article (I haven't read much else about this woman), trouble seems to follow her around.
3 men. One will die, one paying for her child, and the other... well we don't know anything about that guy yet, but I assume his life is about to get more interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Andrei on 04:56 PM September 25th, 2005 EST (#28)
|
|
|
|
|
Kinda reminds one of "Loony McSlut" in the Kobe Brayant attempted lynching. She also MS-behaved such as to show that her claims were lies, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by johnnyp on 11:55 AM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
How dare we force women to keep track of how many men's semen are in them at any one time. She should not have to be put through the turmoil of sorting out which man is actually the father just to collect money she has a right too anyway.
Maybe we ought to have all men pay child support into a huge pool. This way women we can free women of this horrible burden.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:24 PM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
How dare we force women to keep track of how many men's semen are in them at any one time. She should not have to be put through the turmoil of sorting out which man is actually the father just to collect money she has a right too anyway.
Maybe we ought to have all men pay child support into a huge pool. This way women we can free women of this horrible burden
Tell me you were being facetious.
That would not surprise me as so few women have humor. After all, name a commediannne with material other than "men are stupid". Times up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by johnnyp on 01:04 PM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
I was not being facetious, I was being absurd!
;-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:13 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#19)
|
|
|
|
|
Margret Cho is pretty funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:39 PM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
What about Scott Peterson?
HE KILLED HIS WIFE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by johnnyp on 01:05 PM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
I think he got the death penalty - what else do you want?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by jenk on 04:09 PM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that isn't quick enough for the troll, maybe instant death by bolt of lightning from God...oh wait, probably goddess here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by johnnyp on 06:38 PM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:20 PM September 22nd, 2005 EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
”What about Scott Peterson?
HE KILLED HIS WIFE!”
Are you certain? This bitch Fry told a lie to everybody (child included). Paternity fraud is very serious. It is more serious than drug abuse.
Any idea how serious paternity fraud is?
Nope. Didn't think so. The bitch should be in jail and the child put with an honorable family.
An abusive mom should not have a child. Paternity fraud is SERIOUS CHILD ABUSE.
If the court would have known that this bitch was a fraud mom then that would have been clear reasonable doubt.
NOW we learn there was in fact REASONABLE DOUBT.
The testimony of Fry isn't credible.
Scott should be a free man.
OPPS! I FORGOT. SCOTT IS A MAN. HE DESERVES BEING KILLED.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by johnnyp on 07:43 AM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#13)
|
|
|
|
|
From what I heard, the prosecution did not have a "smoking gun" and got the conviction on implication and circumstantial evidence. Peterson may have been convicted because the jury did not like him.
I sure hope he is guilty, because he is going to die for the crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:47 AM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
Without the testimony of paternity fraud bitch queen Amber Frey, Peterson would in no way have been convicted. She is the one that set Scott up.
The police had a choice. Scapegoat a man or a woman. They chose the person with the balls of course because he has a penis.
I've heard the tapes. There was nothing concrete to convict Peterson. It was all just some man bullshitting a woman to get pussy.
In addition, many credible jurors that wanted to actually deliberate were kicked off the jury.
Now we learn the paternity fraud bitch queen Amber Frey was in no way credible and deserves to be in jail on paternity fraud charges.
Nice.
Soon the paternity fraud bitch queen will have used the state to murder Peterson. It was a well-planned scheme. Women are extremely skilled at getting the state to murder men on their behalf.
Motivation? If people have to ask then they are mentally retarded.
This shit happens all the time.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:06 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#15)
|
|
|
|
|
I really hope he's guilty as well because if he's not he is going out of his mind in prison. If you look at the transcripts from the court hearings and articles pusblished, they all talk about how Scott showed no remorse during hearings. One thought that occured to me is how difficult it is to show remorse when you're trying to protect yourself of something you didn't do, especially when the police have botched an investigation that is clearly out to get you, especially this district attorney. Another point they bring up is that Scott went fishing after the disappearance of his wife, and miraculously the bodies show up where he went fishing...I know he's not Einstein but, no idiot dumps the bodies and then tells police exactly where he went, sounds "fishy." It's sad really and this news about Amber Frey must be music to the ears of Scott's parents because they've maintained his innocence all along, as well as Laci's until the police started distorting evidence. No evidence to the murder, and the guy gets sent to death. If he's actually guilty, then bravo to the system, but if not, as Scott's mother says "if you're a man in this country and your wife dies, you better have some record of where you are at all times."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:14 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#16)
|
|
|
|
|
Okay. I'm the one who said "Peterson killed his wife."
Do you all really believe that it was Frey who killed Lacie!
I'm not being facetious, I really want to know.
If you do believe this, Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 02:36 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#17)
|
|
|
|
|
Okay. I'm the one who said "Peterson killed his wife."
Do you all really believe that it was Frey who killed Lacie!
I'm not being facetious, I really want to know.
If you do believe this, Why?
Whaaa....whaaaaa….whaaaa…..
Thing ain’t turning out like the media and the lynch mobs had hoped.
Now the truth is coming out.
It is my opinion that this bitch (AU) is brainwashed by the media like most everybody else.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the trial was rigged.
Notice that the public doesn't get it. Paternity fraud IS VERY SERIOUS. It is so serious that Amber belongs in jail.
Notice how the horrific damage that Amber has caused to her child is being completely over-looked.
Worse it turns out that she had multiple sexual partners, and she has STOLEN enormous sums from an innocent male.
Now you have to question whether Amber killed Laci?
LOL! What a fucking moron!
Without question Amber had the motivation, means, opportunity, and ability to kill Laci.
You are damn right I believe she set-up an innocent man. Now I believe she is about to kill that man to protect her own ass.
She ain't the Christian darling that the media portrayed.
Amber, in my opinion, is a killer and murderer.
Worse Amber is going to get away with the murder for one reason, and that is because she has a vagina.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by johnnyp on 09:16 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#23)
|
|
|
|
|
I have no opinion on Frey – but it is an interesting possibility. What I saw in the news was that there was no physical evidence against Peterson. He got convicted on circumstances, and demeanor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:06 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#18)
|
|
|
|
|
I was brainwashed, too.
It never occurred to me that Frey might have been involved in Lacie's death.
Whoa, how did I MISS that????
And yes it makes perfect sense that the media would make Frey out to be a darling, despite possible evidence that she may have been involved with the murder, since they (The media) do that all the time even when the woman is PROVEN guilty.
Man I feel like an idiot, not even THINKING that Frey could have done it or was somehow involved.
But now i can definitely see where that is quite possible.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:06 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#21)
|
|
|
|
|
Thundercloud. Don't feel bad. They had me to...that is until they started throwing off perfectly good jurors. Then I started checking things out.
It turned out that it was pretty damn clear that Frey was always a prime suspect. The police knew have always had good reason to believe she was framing Peterson. It was really Frey that made allot of suspicious statements.
Motivation? Money. Then when she found out Scott didn't really have any she turned on him. Scott was the consumate Leykis player.
It wasnt' till I heard the tapes that I began to really believe that Frey was setting up Peterson.
It floored me when they would pick out the smallest innocent statement and make a HUGE deal out of nothing.
I could literally see myself trying to woo some blond bitch and saying the exact same things. Hell. If I were pulling a Leykis I would have made much worse incriminating statements.
Peterson's only mistakes were that he should have never cheeted on his wife, and if he did then he should have hired a whore rather than the bitch Frey who framed him.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by crescentluna
(evil_maiden @ yahoo.com)
on 07:15 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#22)
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, being a scummy man in connection to a horrible crime is enough to get one convicted in this country. Really, honestly, I paid NO attention to that trial, but any time you asked someone "What do you think about the trial?" the answer was: "Oh my god, what a horrible man! I hope they burn him at the stake."
"Why do you think he is guilty?"
"Because he is awful! Imagine killing that baby!"
Uhm. Yeah. Basically, nobody was going to let the police get away without a conviction, and who was easiest to convict?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by A.J. on 08:01 PM September 24th, 2005 EST (#27)
|
|
|
|
|
there was no physical evidence against Peterson
More fundamentally, where’s the evidence that a crime was committed? Aren’t we supposed to determine that a crime was committed before we convict someone of it?
I think Petersen probably did it. There’s a lot of circumstantial stuff. But as I understand common law we don’t execute someone because we think they “probably did something bad”? Oops, I mean we’re not supposed to execute people because we think they “probably did something bad”.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:57 PM September 23rd, 2005 EST (#20)
|
|
|
|
|
Could there be a prosection deal with Amber?
Tell a jury what we want to hear about Scott and the fraud and perjury (statements of paternity are under oath after all) on YOUR part will go unpunished.
It makes some sense...
Who would have the power to supress this infomation. Who had the reason to keep this from the jury?
With this revelation, I hope that Peterson (if he is, in fact, innocent) makes this withheld evidence the basis for his appeal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:08 PM September 24th, 2005 EST (#24)
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, yeah. I forgot about the appeal.
(Man I'm batting a thousand, here lately, aren't I?)
Does anyone here think that maybe during the appeal that perhaps Frey's (possible) involvement in Lacie's death might come out?
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:53 PM September 24th, 2005 EST (#25)
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone for some Amber Frey-ed chicken?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:40 PM September 24th, 2005 EST (#26)
|
|
|
|
|
No, thanks.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Anonymous User writes Story