This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Anonymous User on 02:01 PM September 10th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Look at her photo...
The caption should read --- "Predator- 1st Class."
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Anonymous User on 03:45 PM September 10th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
I thinks this proves that its still a mans world.
Sorry guys....only kidding
Hotspur
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Anonymous User on 03:56 PM September 10th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Women are an underclass, despite widespread institutionalized discrimination against men.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Anonymous User on 12:17 PM September 11th, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Good point Dittohd.
But for the first time in our nation's history (errr... HerStory), we face a situation where the MAJORITY defines itself as an OPPRESSED MINORITY.
Thus, they have invented the very clever concept of Victim Power, and have deployed it to full advantage.
And, in so doing, they are controlling language, and the manufacturing of meanings....
Used to be, if your gender represented, let's say, 56% of the enrollment in universities, then (Evil Patriarchal) simple Math defined your group as the MAJORITY!
But not today.
Feminism has shown us all the errors of our ways.
You can actually be a majority and still be oppressed, victimized, and deserving of special entitlements.
It's just simple feminist logic, a form of dementia in which the "=" sign never, ever appears.
And that's because feminism has never been about equality.
It's always been a zero-sum game.
(roy)
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Raymond Cuttill on 09:44 PM September 11th, 2005 EST (#8)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Hi Dittohd,
Sometimes the tribunals or courts get it right. Sometimes when the BBC is up to its tricks I hear how terrible it is to be in Britain. I'd say it's debatable which country is worse for feminism, and somewhat unimportant. A victory anywhere benefits all men.
Raymond
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Anonymous User on 06:02 AM September 11th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
"I want to be... very very rich".
She also said: "I'm 36, unmarried and loving it. My social life is amazing and I date famous people."
The panel also heard she had made a previous complaint about a female FA colleague who paid her "too close attention".
Got previous form , wants to be rich, had 2 affairs already in the office, sold her story to a newspaper (reported here in the UK).
The real sad part of this is that no-one had the nerve to say no to the case on the grounds that it was so obvious she was an avaricious sexual predator.
She's simply another brainwashed pseudo feminist who believes that the only reason people don't rate or respect her is because she's female, rather than because of her actions.
Another delusional who has only made it more difficult for those with genuine grievances.
|
|
 |
 |
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|