|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by jenk on 10:30 AM August 28th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
The only problem is it looks like only women will be isued guns. Yet last year over 10% of deaths were men. So are the men who are abused left with nothing, or are the women going to be able to falsify abuse to get the gun then get off scott free for killing their 'abusive' husband in self defence? While this scenario is not going to happen frequently, it will happen often enough to make this not viable.
Geez, what next, just execute any alleged abuser?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:24 AM August 28th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, now THIS is intelligent.(sarcasm)
Who was the genius that came up with this bright idea...? (sarcasm again)
Man, just when ya think it can't get any more
stupid.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:29 PM August 28th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
Yep.
As I've said before, steadily women are becoming the "007 gender". 'licensed to kill.'
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:28 PM August 28th, 2005 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
Come to think of it, they already have a license to kill. This measure will just help them exercise that right.
Hotspur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:57 PM August 29th, 2005 EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
Men are the new "niggers".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:25 PM August 28th, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
"This sounds to me like a license to kill."
Exactly.
Hotspur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:02 PM August 29th, 2005 EST (#13)
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina?
The swine farm capitol of the world?
Am I the only one who hears a banjo and the theme song from "Deliverance" playing in the state's legislature?
They should give women guns only after they solve the real sexual abuse problem in that neighborhood ...
Can pigs hire lawyers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 02:02 PM August 28th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
America's war on men is reaching a new height, and here's how it will work to perfection.
#1 First the woman lies, and gets the man locked up so the man has his gun(s) taken away.
#2 While he's in jail, she gets a gun,
#3 then when he gets out she calls him, tells him all is well, invites him over, pumps 12 rounds into him, puts a kitchen knife in his hand, then says he's a batterer who was coming after her.
It will work everytime in gender feminist, Nazi America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Hunchback on 02:49 PM August 28th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
The fems tried that nonsense in NY State about 15 years ago, only then it was mace. The outlawed substance was to be allowed only to women...so they could feel safe on the streets. But this beats that by a mile. It's right up there with Archie Bunker's suggestion that airlines had out guns to passengers to prevent hijacking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:59 PM August 29th, 2005 EST (#12)
|
|
|
|
|
You sound like you all think that women will take advantage of this.
Women would never do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:25 PM August 29th, 2005 EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
I wish I could recall which commentator it was, but he stated:
Anything that can be abused will be, sooner or later
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 04:55 PM August 29th, 2005 EST (#15)
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Acton said, "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Absolute Power
...and here is a little more the writings and history of Lord Acton
Here's a good article on Angry Harry's site, Feminism Demands the Right to Dominate , where the term "absolute power corrupts absolutely," is used.
There is this from Machevelli - It is much safer to be feared than loved
"Louis XI* would agree with Machevelli. Louis XI was called the Aterrible king@. He used cruel methods to keep his power and was very successful. His goal was to break the power of the nobles and he was able to do so. He made and broke whatever laws pleased him. He passed extreme taxes. Louis XI was able to set the stage for future kings to have absolute power because he was feared."
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:00 PM August 30th, 2005 EST (#16)
|
|
|
|
|
Good article, that.
And yes it is true that the feminists want to take away the right of free speech from, not just MRA's, but men as a whole.
The trouble is (and the feminists seem not to realise this,) but where free speech ends is usually where wars begin...,
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Anonymous User writes "