[an error occurred while processing this directive]
"Disruptive" Toddlers to be Treated as Potential Criminals
posted by Matt on 01:28 PM June 13th, 2005
Boys/Young Men Ray writes "If the government report in this news story is concerned about targeting preschoolers who grow up to be bullies, does that mean the children of gender feminists will be 1st in line for remedial correction?

Excerpt:

'CHILDREN as young as three are to be singled out by nursery staff if they display aggressive behaviour or have a family background of criminality, according to a government report.'"

Manhaters.com | New Child Support Rules - Australia  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Save us from ourselves, comrade? (Score:2)
by Raymond Cuttill on 07:05 PM June 13th, 2005 EST (#1)
Yes, they're going to save youngsters (mostly boys of course) from a life of crime. They will be spotted by nursery teachers (mostly women and full of PC ideas) who spot boys who are disruptive (perhaps bored with a lesson where girls are praised and boys are ignored) and passed to psychiatrists (Perhaps like the ones who’ve released people who shortly afterwards murdered someone or the ones who, when a man says “I’m really a women”, think it must be true). They’re going to save them with reading writing, social skills (a lot of “Jill has got it right. Why can’t you be more like Jill?”). There is even been some discussion about locking these proto-criminal boys up permanently and then of course you’ll have no crime right? (Apart from the 12 year old girl who tried to hang a 5 year old and others like her; and not to mention that successful criminals are the ones who behave like everyone until you find something is missing).
Re:Save us from ourselves, comrade? (Score:1)
by SacredNaCl on 05:33 AM June 14th, 2005 EST (#2)
Reminds me of the self fufilling prophecy, single people out and treat them like third class citizens and criminals and they will eventually become them.

The "psychology-state" is far worse than the tyranny of the punishment state we have now. The punishment state only acts after people are accused of some crime or moral lacking and meets out punishments of fixed terms. The psychology state on the other hand, has no set terms, waits for no crime or moral lacking - it meets out "treatment" that can last forever, and in this case its going to meet out "pre-treatment". This is truly scary stuff.


Freedom Is Merely Privilege Extended Unless Enjoyed By One & All.
Re:Save us from ourselves, comrade? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 12:26 PM June 14th, 2005 EST (#3)
What was the name of that movie that Tom Cruise was in where they "predicted" crimes before they happened? This sounds alot like the same thing only less efficient...,
And since ALL MEN are "potential rapists" you can imagine how mis-used this thing will be.

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:Save us from ourselves, comrade? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:43 PM June 14th, 2005 EST (#4)
The film is Minority Report.
Re: We Are All "Living in 'Sus" (Score:2)
by Roy on 01:46 PM June 15th, 2005 EST (#6)
"Minority Report" was an interesting film that attempted to show a dystopian future where technology and cyber-clairvoyance could allow society to supress crime by targeting profiled individuals deemed "about to commit a crime."

(It also had a hair-brained plot device that relied on being able to see the future.)

But the "psychology state" where everybody is "under suspicion of the intent to commit a crime in the future" is already here and has been for decades.

In Jamaica in the 1970's the government passed a "Sus Law" that allowed anyone to be locked up for just such a charge. (It was used largely against the Rastafarian community that was getting a bit too militant under the influence of Bob Marley's reggae revolution...)

The feminists have refined this Orwellian concept the furthest by successfully criminalizing maleness. VAWA 2005 is a thinly-veiled code for this ideological weapon that now defines every boy as a rapist-in-training who is in need of pre-emptive psycho-dynamic education to prevent his "natural" maturation into a misogynist sexual predator.

The scariest throw-away line in the piece above about the British solution to preventing criminality by targeting three year-olds was this one --

"They will not be run by teachers but by voluntary groups or privately."

And just how many working British men will have the "free" time to volunteer in this noble campaign?

It will be staffed by 99% women who benefit from the government dole or from having working husbands/male partners.

Of course, what's the beef?

All boys already grow up in a thoroughly matriarchal society where the vast majority of their time is spent under the control of female authority figures. (Mommies, day-care providers, elementary and secondary teachers.)

Myabe the "metrosexual" phenomenon is not a coincidence at all?

It's merely the logical adaptive strategy of boys trying to be like the powerful all-female overlords they "grew up under."


"It's a terrible thing ... to be living in fear."
You evil people (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:08 PM June 15th, 2005 EST (#5)
Oh, you people. Although it goes completely against every principle in my body, I will say this to you. You are all evil. You are all the bane of society. I have had it up to here (I'm pointing to a point right above my head) with the superiority that exudes from very pore of your bodies. It runs off you like sweat, oily and yellowed, turning you to a corrupt kind of shell; crumpled and cracked and blackened all over your paper-deep image. It smells as rank to me as the dying breath of a man soaked all his life in his own bodily fluids. You are repellent to me like nothing else, like nothing I could possibly imagine. if I had one wish, I would ask for you to be made able to see, because in that instant I would know that I have cleansed the world of one little pit of tarred sickness.

~Huitzilopoctli
Re:You evil people (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 05:30 PM June 15th, 2005 EST (#7)
,i>"Oh, you people. Although it goes completely against every principle in my body, I will say this to you. You are all evil. You are all the bane of society. I have had it up to here (I'm pointing to a point right above my head) with the superiority that exudes from very pore of your bodies. It runs off you like sweat, oily and yellowed..."

So in your assessment, other than all that, we're alright, eh?

Have a nice day.

Ray
Re:You evil people... silly people? (Score:2)
by Roy on 08:33 PM June 15th, 2005 EST (#8)
Golly gosh,

I've just been posting for months and months trying desperately to get such a glowing review of my ideas FROM MY ENEMY!

Thank you!

You have given me ten more years of fuel and resolve...

You silly, trivial w-o-r-d-s-o-n-a-s-c-r-e-e-n!

You represent the very BEST that feminism has to offer in a real contest.

Do you think men even consider you as an equal?

Do you think being an equal means qualifying as a real adversary?

You know nothing about war.

So sad.


"It's a terrible thing ... to be living in fear."
Re:You evil people (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:08 AM June 17th, 2005 EST (#11)
Oh, what is wrong with you people!? Are any of you actually above the age of five? How can you all not understand the most BASIC IRONY? Are you people completely mentally retardant (different to retarded btw. mentaly retardent is where common sense bounces off you)? You say that feminism is fascist and destructive, then I call you all evil and secreting arrogance, in a compltely over the top and verbose way. How could you possibly think I was being serious? How could you possibly feel that I was trying to enrage you? Seriously now, I hope you all feel ashamed, because the stupidest person I know could have understood this. For all that you posture and pump up your heads, you all seem unable to grasp the most basic linguistic satire. Flaming is always ridiculous. it is never actually based on reality. So why, why would you think that? Just to let you know, what I consider the baddest thing of all is a bunch of men who sit at home arguing for ignorance and constriction. that will be what ruins society, long before any bombs go off in America.

~Huitzilopoctli
Re:You evil people (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 06:38 PM June 16th, 2005 EST (#9)
Pathetic. What this idiot doesn't realize is that if they made about three phone calls to a CA female legislator with this type of message it would be reported to the police.

The bases for seeking the person's arrest is that the staff would claim that the message caused them to experience fear because of the content and the frequency of the message.

Next, there would be a police investigation complete with them showing up at your door.

Think the Marxist-Feminist "psycho-state" isn't real? Try it.

I promise that you do this a couple of times as described that you'll end up in jail as a political prisoner.

Warble
Re:You evil people (Score:1)
by bukowski on 11:44 PM June 16th, 2005 EST (#10)
'in that instant I would know that I have cleansed the world of one little pit of tarred sickness.'

You sound similar to one of those homophobes who hates gay men with so much passion because they fear their own sexuality.

No matter how hard you try to cleanse your own dark side by scapegoating it onto others it will still be there to scare you of yourself. Have fun....

Oh...it never ends...ha ha ha (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:46 AM June 17th, 2005 EST (#12)
Oh, what is wrong with you people!? Are any of you actually above the age of five? How can you all not understand the most BASIC IRONY? Are you people completely mentally retardant (different to retarded btw. mentaly retardent is where common sense bounces off you)? You say that feminism is fascist and destructive, then I call you all evil and secreting arrogance, in a compltely over the top and verbose way. How could you possibly think I was being serious? How could you possibly feel that I was trying to enrage you? Seriously now, I hope you all feel ashamed, because the stupidest person I know could have understood this. For all that you posture and pump up your heads, you all seem unable to grasp the most basic linguistic satire. Flaming is always ridiculous. it is never actually based on reality. So why, why would you think that? Just to let you know, what I consider the baddest thing of all is a bunch of men who sit at home arguing for ignorance and constriction. that will be what ruins society, long before any bombs go off in America.

~Huitzilopoctli
       

Re:Oh...it never ends...ha ha ha (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:29 PM June 17th, 2005 EST (#13)
Hunkapocketlite...

"How could you possibly think I was being serious?"

Ummmm, 'cause you write so well?

By the way, your name in Hopi language means "the flem I cannot expel from my throat."

But you already knew that.
Re:Oh...it never ends...ha ha ha (Score:1)
by bukowski on 07:22 PM June 17th, 2005 EST (#14)
First you say you weren't seriour, that we're little boys for not seeing your lack of serious-ness, and you tell us how mentally retardent for not seeing your genious at satire.

And then you go on to say how awful, or bad, we are to you in your so valuable opinion.

You flame, and goad, to get attention, that you must sorely lack in "reality". Then you get sanctimonious when you get the attention that you so desired.

By the way. In "reality', as you can see from the above topic, men ARE seen as inherently evil. Please forgive us to mirroring that which you, once again, despise in yourself, but project on to others.
Re:Oh...it never ends...ha ha ha (Score:1)
by bukowski on 07:25 PM June 17th, 2005 EST (#15)
sorry, possibly it was partly my dyslexia that confuddled some of what I wrote in the above.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]