[an error occurred while processing this directive]
VAWA - Abusing Justice to Destroy Fathers
posted by Matt on 10:52 AM June 12th, 2005
Inequality Ray writes "After the tragic news that some of our elected buffons have again proposed to fund the hate war against men known as VAWA, this article is refreshing in its honesty for putting the truth about VAWA in clear persepective."

They Start Young | Site Encourages Boys to Read!  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
funding anti-male hate (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 09:58 PM June 12th, 2005 EST (#1)
Billions of dollars have flowed from VAWA to the states to finance private victim-advocacy organizations, private domestic-violence coalitions, and the training of judges, prosecutors and police. This tax-funded network is, of course, staffed by radical feminists who teach the presumption of father guilt.

Yup. And that's called "equal justice under law." Thank you for your honesty, Ms. Schalfly.
VAWA is fraud and has no integrity (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 12:07 PM June 13th, 2005 EST (#2)
Here's a good article on MND:
Ray

How To End Father-Absence When Divorce is Necessary

June 13, 2005
by David R. Usher

"False child abuse or domestic violence allegations made by the petitioner have become standard strategic tactics in divorce, particularly where child custody is involved. False child abuse allegations were more popular in the 1980’s, until judges realized most of them are false. During the 1990’s, feminists discovered it was more fruitful to use false spouse abuse allegations, because they don’t involve programming a child to do the bidding of the divorcing spouse. Using manufactured data and fear, feminists invented the “Violence Against Women” Act, which provided federal funding to assure feminist conquests in the vast majority of divorces. Like the ACLU, feminists running women’s abuse centers frantically work only one side of the issue without care for the realities of the situation. Judges do not have time to hear 95% of the cases that come before them. About 95% of clients do not have the $30,000 or more in cash needed to try a custody case, the $25,000 needed to disprove false allegations of spousal abuse. Any allegation of abuse against the father is enough to decide the custody issue, and make it quite difficult for fathers to even get parenting time, regardless of the absurdity of the allegations. In effect, family law courts leave 99 children fatherless to protect the one child who was actually abused in 100 cases."

[an error occurred while processing this directive]