[an error occurred while processing this directive]
More scary civil liberty violations at hand in MA
posted by Matt on 10:39 PM June 8th, 2005
Inequality CJ writes "This is very important information to understand. Restraining orders which are handled out in MA in almost every divorce case in MA, makes the "victim" of "abuse" (read woman) eligible for police protection, police transportation, free social services, simplified filing forms, free and unlimited access to the courts, immunity from perjury, a comprehensive recital and listing of her "rights" under Chapter 209A, the children from her relationship with the accused, and the property and salary of the accused, among other perks."

Click "Read more..." for more.


"Now a new statute intends to add the following: Women would be entitled to live wherever they want without any contractual obligations, by merely pointing a finger at a man.

Summary: Bill: HB3163 - Entitles victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, rape or stalking to terminate rental agreements on residential housing without penalty; regulates the termination of rental agreements by said victims; prohibits landlords from terminating a rental agreement, refusing to renew a rental agreement or refusing to enter into a rental agreement on the basis of status as a victim of domestic violence, rape, sexual assault or stalking; imposes civil penalties for said discrimination. There is one thing you must do to end this injustice now. Contact the members of the Mass Judiciary Committee - start with the cochairmen - and demand they support the Fatherhood Coalition restraining order reform legislation.

THERE IS NO OTHER DIRECT WAY TO START FIXING THIS PROBLEM THIS YEAR."

Zero-sum Gender War: Sweden's Feminist Initiative | VAWA 2005 Bill Introduced to Congress Yesterday  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
new motive (Score:1, Insightful)
by Anonymous User on 03:49 AM June 9th, 2005 EST (#1)

Wow, now women in Mass have another major reason to falsely accuse men of DV - to get out of a rental lease.

We better organize as well as talk about the growth of injustice.
Re:new motive (Score:1)
by Kyo on 07:49 AM June 9th, 2005 EST (#2)
So these women get these rights before anyone is determined to be guilty?

If you're a landlord and a woman damages your property in the process of faking a stalker incident, is your right to evict her trumped by this law?
Protect Them From Themselves? (Score:2)
by Dittohd on 11:31 AM June 9th, 2005 EST (#3)

>We better organize...

I mostly disagree. Don't forget, Massachusetts is the same state that has been reelecting Senator Edward Kennedy all these years, even after he was responsible for the death of Mary Jo Kopechne many years ago and did his best to use his money and power and influence to cover it up. Not to mention all his out and out womanizing.

IMHO, Massachusetts is a liberal mecca and everyone who lives there should get everything they deserve for keeping these type of people in office. Even John Kerry is from Massachusetts. If they like liberal, they should live by liberal.

It seems that I remember reading somewhere recently that Massachusetts is one of the few states where they consistently show a net loss of people each year as a result of so many people moving away to other states.

Dittohd


Re:Protect Them --- Wait Till You Read VAWA 2005! (Score:1, Informative)
by Anonymous User on 12:42 PM June 9th, 2005 EST (#4)
The VAWA 2005 reauthorization bill introduced to Congress yesterday contains an entire section, "Title VI:Housing Opportunities and Safety for Battered Women and Children."

It proposes hundreds of millions of dollars to enforce special housing rights for women who "allege" they are being abused.

Read the bill's summary at --
http://biden.senate.gov/documents/VAWA_Sec_060605. pdf
Re:Protect Them --- Wait Till You Read VAWA 2005! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:07 PM June 9th, 2005 EST (#7)
This cultivated ignorance of male victims is truly repulsive. It shows how the domestic violence industry cares most of all about demonizing men.
Re:Protect Them From Themselves? (Score:1, Insightful)
by Anonymous User on 02:57 PM June 9th, 2005 EST (#5)
Conservative chivalry feminists are just as big problem as the leftist dialectal/historical materialist feminists. Who cares if the abuse in Mass. happens to come from the liberal side?

I'm a MRA regardless of where on the political spectrum misandry comes from! Indeed, the excesses in Mass. law make for good rhetorical talking points. Good argumentative examples.

Father's and men are suffering a lot of legal system abuse in MA, they're in pain--I want to protect their rights and reduce their suffering, and their children's suffering.

Besides! the rights of men in MA are our rights too, damnit!. We're Americans, these are everybody's rights!

Lets to stick together for a few years until we get the changes we need. Then, if we want to, we can go back to bickering about what side of the political fence we think everyone else ought to be on.
 
Re:Protect Them From Themselves? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 02:57 PM June 10th, 2005 EST (#8)
"Father's and men are suffering a lot of legal system abuse in MA, they're in pain--I want to protect their rights and reduce their suffering, and their children's suffering.

I agree with Dittohead but for different reasons. If these men are suffering so much pain why is it that they fail to organize?

I have no sympathy for them anymore.

I am an MRA and I've become convinced that men will have to suffer orders of magnitudes worse before they'll get it through their retarded brains that it is time to act.

Hell. Men are so stupid in California that when I sit down to explain to them how the laws have changed they call me a liar.

For those guys when they get 911’d as far as I’m concerned they were warned.

At least I won't be found on the roadside not able to say I didn't at least tried while these dumb asses drink beer and watch T.V. .

Warble

Re:Protect Them From Themselves? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 02:58 PM June 10th, 2005 EST (#9)
"Lets to stick together for a few years until we get the changes we need. Then, if we want to, we can go back to bickering about what side of the political fence we think everyone else ought to be on."

Exactly. Well said and key point.

Warble
Re:Protect Them From Themselves? (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 03:06 PM June 12th, 2005 EST (#11)
Thank you.


"...show young men an ideal of manhood that respects women and rejects violence" George W. Bush - Republican 2005

Re:Protect Them From Themselves? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:13 PM June 9th, 2005 EST (#6)
do you suggest vacating the state of all its good people?

In case you didn't know, 30% of people in MA voted against the radical liberals...

being an abused minority stinks... this is the case for all men in MA
dittohead, indeed (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 03:06 PM June 12th, 2005 EST (#10)
And just what does your rant have to do with MR? I'm waiting for all those ac's to come in and start lambasting you for bringing up irrlevant partisan politics...waiting...waiting...waiting. Huh, they don't seem to be around. Well to throw some water on your rant of unproven accusastions and partisan crabassing, MA has the lowest divorce rate in the country. The states with the worst divorce rates are red states. And the majority of the justices in MA that legalized gay marriage were appointed by Republicans, a fact you didn't hear too much in the rush to ban it last year.


"...show young men an ideal of manhood that respects women and rejects violence" George W. Bush - Republican 2005

[an error occurred while processing this directive]