|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Luek on 10:54 AM March 18th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm presently trying to decide whether or stop my subscription to their Whistleblower magazine and request a refund for the rest of that subscription
Hey, JUST DO IT! And let them know why you are no longer supporting their misandry.
Then send the money to help support this site or to other organizations that support men's rights. A "no brainer"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:42 AM March 18th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
It wasn't Blake who was described as a career con artist, but his wife. I don't see why you're bent out of shape over the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Luek on 04:02 PM March 18th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
It wasn't Blake who was described as a career con artist, but his wife. I don't see why you're bent out of shape over the article
I thought that too. It may have been originally written with a typo implying that Blake was the con artist but I believe they corrected it.
BUT....read the link about Clara Harris. This article just drips with misandry and of course it was written by a self-loathing male.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Tumescent on 04:40 PM March 18th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
The Blake article, at least how it reads now, shows nothing objectionable-- and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that the original article had a typo and was later fixed. That happens occasionally-- but it brings up something I think needs to be said at times. Sometimes I think we all need to be careful not to read too much into things. Not all newspaper accounts are misandric or have some ulterior motive or are part of a conspiracy against men. I'm not saying you did that here, but if we overreact to everything we lose credibility on the things we truly should be upset and concerned about. As to your second point--I agree-- that Clara Harris article is amazing. While reading the article I thought the guy was kidding or was using sarcasm or some other literary device. I couldn't tell he was serious until the end of the article. He can't really believe what he wrote can he?
Memo to Joesph Farah... try to grow some balls....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:29 PM March 18th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Would any mainstream media source say that a man is justified killing his wife if she cheats on him? No. This article clearly illustrates media bias against men (written by a emasculated idiot no less...) I figure the writer wants a piece of journalistic ass at his work for being a good little feninist idiot.
There is no accountability any more for the kind of wanton irresponsibility David "The Creep" Harris showed toward his wife and his children. There's no penalty any more for adultery, for abandonment of one's spouse and children. The state doesn't get involved – except to divide up the property and sort out custody issues. No one is punished.
And that, I believe, is why America's families are crumbling at such an alarming rate.
People are no longer accountable to anyone. They don't believe they are accountable to God. They don't believe they are accountable to their spouses. And they don't believe they are accountable to their children. They are not accountable to the state, as no-fault divorce laws have made certain.
Since everyone is abdicating responsibility and accountability, there are sure to be more incidents like the Harris affair.
If I were on that jury, I would find Clara Harris not guilty. After she was sprung, I'd give her a medal. She did the world a favor. She may have acted emotionally. She may be sorry for what she has done. But, frankly, she did the right thing. That creep deserved what he got.
Apparently I am not alone in my thinking on this. Even "The Creep's" own parents have stood by Clara Harris' side through this ordeal.
Free this woman now and let her rebuild a life with her poor children – who have been victimized enough by the trauma instigated by the dead creep.
Free her and let her be an example to every cheating husband and wife in America. There is a price to pay. Sometimes it's the ultimate price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:16 PM March 19th, 2005 EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
Women rarely cheat on their husbands.
And if they do it's because the husband is a jerk.
Men cheat because of who men are. Women cheat because of who men are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:23 PM March 20th, 2005 EST (#12)
|
|
|
|
|
>"Men cheat because of who men are. Women cheat because of who men are."
Wow. for being as irrational as feminists like you are, you all sure rationalize alot.
Your above statement is evidence of that, if I've ever seen it.
Typical feminist one-sidedness.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 02:01 PM March 20th, 2005 EST (#13)
|
|
|
|
|
Men cheat because of who men are. Women cheat because of who men are.
Great example of the anti-male hate pervasive in the world today. Hey, hate-monger, take your hating somewhere else!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:58 PM March 20th, 2005 EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
Don't feed the trolls!
It only encourages them.
Cameron
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read this article calling to free Clara Harris and that there should be more women like her.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTI CLE_ID=30762
--bandersnatch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Dittohd writes "World Net Daily reported on