DNA Acquits but court still wants a trial

	posted by Matt on 11:52 AM January 21st, 2005
	bharati writes "DNA acquits and yet prosecution wants to continue and army wants to court marshall. Need I say more?"

<  Intellect related to sucide risk | Collecting a DNA sample from every man in town  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

When The "Fix" Is In It Is In! (Score:2) by Luek on 12:08 PM January 21st, 2005 EST (#1) Even with DNA exonorating this man he is still believed to be guilty! It is obvious that when the judicial "fix" is in it is not that easy to recend it. If you remember the infamous Gary Dodson false rape conviction case of a couple of years ago, when he was cleared of the rape conviction it still took him several months to get out of the Gulag! Also, this miscarriage of justice in this story is taking place in India proven that governmental misandry is pandemic like the common cold and not just confined to the Western cultures.

Staggering (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 04:29 PM January 21st, 2005 EST (#2) DNA matches? - Guilty (see thread about Boston DNA dragnet). DNA doesn't match? - Guilty. Sickening

Court what? (Score:1) by n.j. on 07:59 PM January 21st, 2005 EST (#3) At least the headlines should be correct, how can anyone confuse martial with marshall anyway?

Re:Court what? (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 03:15 AM January 22nd, 2005 EST (#4) My appologies English not my native language though I claim to be extremely fluent

[an error occurred while processing this directive]