This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:44 PM January 16th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a new person named Marc who is posting here? So far I'm the only "Marc" that has been, or at least that I've seen. I'm glad to see another. It means we're growing. But, so that nobody confuses us, I'll post as "Marc A." from now on.
Marc A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by mozzie on 06:33 AM January 17th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for this.
I've just passed it on to the commitee on child support
(Australia) that is looking to make things fairer for NCPs.
Once again thanks NH and Mensactivism.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by bigbadwolf3210 on 08:58 PM January 17th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
ummm... i think things along this same vien are happening in tennessee. at least in the memphis area. good news for dad's getting the shaft. it's about time. bigbadwolf3210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Luek on 09:04 AM January 19th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
I applaud any effort to do something about reforming the corrupt child support racket. However the statement about the *state* setting the economic level a child should be supported at rather than the parents deciding that indicates to me that things will not change for the better. This is because the state is saying it is far superior in determining how much money a child needs to be supported rather than what the parents together deciding on what that level should be base on their combined incomes and expenses.
"My understanding is that the next step is an attempt to get an appropriation passed by the New Hampshire legislature to provide for expert economists to objectively determine what the real level of support should be"
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]