|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by n.j. on 12:31 PM January 6th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
The article says something about one of the children being called Mary, that wasn't a boy was it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Kyo on 12:32 PM January 6th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
(all boys)
Actually, her youngest (6-month-old Mary) is presumably a girl.
I wonder if, had a father murdered his five children, four of the five being female would have merited a mention?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Luek on 05:05 PM January 6th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
She was only charged with the murders of a couple of her Domestic Violence victims. And I think they were boys.
She was not charged with the murder of the other domestic violence victims because they could be used by the prosecution to charge her again with murder just in case some judiciary horsesh*t like what happened today occurred and she was set free as the breeze.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:39 AM January 7th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
Please read this:
http://www.cblpolicyinstitute.org/yatesnow.htm
"
The Texas National Organization for Women has helped establish the Andrea Pia Yates Support Coalition, a group of organizations that support confessed murderer Andrea Yates, a Houston-area woman who systematically murdered all five of her children in their bathtub. "
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:30 AM January 7th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
Andrea Yutz, is more like it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Luek on 01:31 PM January 7th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
The femiroid misandrists are really giving it to Rusy Yates on the Courttv.com message board.
They are pumping out the usual bs that HE is the real culprit in the drowning murders the 5 children not Andrea Yates.
I have posted 3 replies so far but no one seems to want to answer them. :-)
Go over there and try your luck! It is a lot of fun and keeps the misandrists on the run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:40 PM January 8th, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
I went over there though I didn't see the name 'luek', so I didn't know which person you wer,e but no matter.
i like that, 'he shouldn't have "allowed" her to get pregnant' , and then conveniently at the same time they demonize him for controlling her which I guess I' suppose in part'caused' her to killing her children.
I have never ever heard of such arguments I've seen over this case being applied to a man who kills his children and blaming the mother. If you did that they'd say you were blaming the victim. The mother being the victim from having her children killed by the father.
Same situation, reverse the genders, and the mother is the victim too.
Oh yeah, it'd be "domestic violence" as well.
p george
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
dschmidt writes "The Associated Press is reporting that a