|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apetr you are a silly billy !
If a shelter was provided for men, this would all too soon become filled and create a demand for more shelters. By not providing a single shelter, then all too evidently - there is no demand for same, and, the denial of such abuse can continue unhindered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, another problem is that a "shelter" wouldn't be widely used for sake of the name itself. Through either nature or nurture, men are raised to be stoic, emotionless, and an unmoveable force.
See, women can use shelters because, for some reason, feminists like to say they're equals at this, or stronger at that, and yet still fall back on the pity party when it suits them. When a woman says she's in a shelter, he friends can tutter in concern for her safety, and talk about the evils of men. Even if a man were to use a shelter, chances are most off the street would consider him to be a "sissy" or "gay" or whatever.
-DeepThought
---
Erase the EARTH
to gmail me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:52 AM September 11th, 2004 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, a prime reason for womens "shelters" is that they provide a perfect environment for feminazi indoctrination. Conversely, feminists see how dangerous for them it would be if male victims of femnaziism were brought together in mens shelters. It would be an excellent environment for evolution of menist ideology.
Hotsur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not only are women's shelters excellent for indoctrination but even the existence of men's shelters would call their lie of only men perpetuators and women victims. They also don't want lesbian victims in women's shelters because that would undermine the idea of only male perpetuators and nor do they want gays helped as that would challenge the lie that only heterosexual men do it. Having different shelters for men and women might mean someone would suggest it was wasteful and they should merge. Someone might ask awkward questions about how helpful these shelters actually are and where the money is going. Currently they seem to accept any woman with any story and not be too worried if it is true or a repeat victim as all this boosts the numbers which means more funding, and they use the funding for women's conferences and publicity. The paid trips and the male-bashing DV campaigns might loose their funding or men would be able to fund conferences and ad campaigns. In any case they don't won't to acknowledge any male victim in any capacity (paternity fraud, false accusations, suicides) as this would open the door on male victims in other areas. It is getting harder for them to claim only women victims or men perpetuators but they are still trying. Tiny cracks are starting to appear in the dam.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
