|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For this reason, among others, in 2002 Davis vetoed the California Paternity Justice Act, (AB 2240), which would have extended the challenge period and vacated judgments against falsely named "fathers." Women who knowingly signed false declarations of paternity would have been liable for criminal prosecution.
(Another factor in Davis' veto was the political pressure of groups like the National Organization of Women, who successfully argued that passing the act would harm children who might lose support payments.)
The above statement taken from McElroy's article has two bits of information that are interesting.
A good news/bad news type of thing.
The good news side is that the misandrous male feminist, Guy Davis who vetoed this excellent piece of man friendly legislation got fired from his state services job by recall. However, I don't recall that vetoing AB 2240 was one of the reasons for Davis's termination. Considering the anti-male mind set of the California State legislature it is a miracle such a progressive piece of legislation got passed in the first place!
Now for the down side. Just why didn't the men of California rise up in massive outrage when AB 2240 was vetoed in 2002? I hope they did and somehow I just did not catch it on the media. I also hope that there is not some general malaise on part of men out in California about securing their rights and reforming the law in the matters of paternity fraud, child support/custody and divorce litigation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:53 PM July 14th, 2004 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Now for the down side. Just why didn't the men of California rise up in massive outrage when AB 2240 was vetoed in 2002? I hope they did and somehow I just did not catch it on the media. I also hope that there is not some general malaise on part of men out in California about securing their rights and reforming the law in the matters of paternity fraud, child support/custody and divorce litigation.
The paternity fraud groups fought for months .... hell over a year now since AB2240 was vetoed. At times the police state of California threatend arrests, followed the activist around at night, and acted like the gestapo, which they are. Men had better wake up and take notice on this fact....
Now the victims have AB252 which is almost complete, but if the appelate court ruling remains published it may prove even better than the new legislation.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 09:11 PM July 14th, 2004 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
"I also hope that there is not some general malaise on part of men out in California about securing their rights and reforming the law in the matters of paternity fraud, child support/custody and divorce litigation."
I'm still trying to get guys into the men's movement in California, but have had more success pushing a string or herding cats.
Ray
P.S. Governor Schwarzenegger saw this T-shirt last month as he was walking down a hallway in Sacramento, and actually stopped to ask what it meant. We're not sure what was on the back, but it was what was on the front that he asked about, i.e., "DEADBEAT GOVERNMENT" Specifically he said, "What does that mean?"
(click) Paternity Fraud Is Deadbeat Government
Please do not scroll up the page of the linked item(s). All the information I am trying to convey is as the page comes up initially
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
