[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Women charged with dog-drowning, false reporting
posted by Matt on 12:49 PM May 25th, 2004
News Another example of a counter-stereotype. Won't see this story beyond local news: Woman Drowns Boyfriend's Little Dachshund and 2 women charged in dog killing

I am amazed it made it that far, really.

Murder Over a Sexual Harassment Suit? | Carpitcher Loses Appeal  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Why...? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:02 PM May 25th, 2004 EST (#1)
Why did they have to KILL that little dog?

If they HAD to get rid of it, why not give it away to some one in another town, Give it to an animal shelter? Even DUMPING him would have been more humane than takeing the poor little guy in your own hands and DROWNING him!
What kind of person DOES that?!?
I mean LOOK at the picture of the little guy. HOW could you live with yourself after looking into those little eyes as you drown him in a tub?!?
I really don't know what to say.
My God...!

  Thundercdloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:Why...? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:05 PM May 25th, 2004 EST (#2)
I miss-spelled my own name.
That's a good way to tell how MAD this makes me.

Let's try that again.

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"

That's better.
Re:Why...? (Score:2)
by Raymond Cuttill on 06:22 PM May 27th, 2004 EST (#10)
(User #266 Info)
Sigmund Freud rides again?

It's hard to imagine the mindset involved with these women. I have difficulty imagining killing an animal this way. The boyfriend sounds like a guy who had a friendly dog and then though he'd also found a friend. Was the girlfriend intimidated by this dog? threatened? And even if true, just avoid the dog. Not only does it show scant regard for the life of a defenceless animal, but also scant regard for the boyfriend's feelings. The boyfriend sounds completely perplexed how someone could apparently be a friend and then do this. Presumably she wanted to continue the relationship, and perhaps even help him grieve the loss of the dog. Had she been harbouring these feelings for the 2 years they wren involved? And keeping it from the boyfriend, but seething away inside? And they say men don't communicate.

Raymond Cuttill
menshour@menshour.com

Men's Hour Blog - http://men.typepad.com

Men's Books
http://www.cyberManbooks.com
Re:Why...? (Score:1)
by Peter on 08:49 PM May 25th, 2004 EST (#4)
(User #1513 Info)
they are very lucky that was not one of my dogs. If anyone ever delibertly killed one of my animals, they would be shot execution style by myself. Man, women, would not matter they would be dead. No one would ever find their remains either.
you and DMX (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 03:08 AM May 26th, 2004 EST (#5)
(User #700 Info)
The rapper apparantly has a thing for bulldogs, and has over a dozen or something. Some smuck ran over one of his dogs, and DMX proceeded to beat the tar outta the guy. Only reason he didn't die is because a bunch of people pulled DMX off of him.
Prez and Vice Prez of the Andrea Yates Fan Club (Score:1)
by zenpriest on 02:49 PM May 26th, 2004 EST (#9)
(User #1286 Info)
Why did they have to KILL that little dog?

After centuries of being covert, indirect, and often accomplished through 3rd parties, female violence is finally out of the closet thanks to feminism and female "empowerment."

They killed it because they were cruel and attached no value to life - just like Andrea Yates, Susan Smith, the two mothers mentioned on this site within the past month or so who killed their children, and countless other women too numerous to mention or never discovered.

The culture has bred and reinforced this for women. Look at the popularity of the "Kill Bill" movies. Women's bloodlust has been let out of the dungeon, and for the near future no one will be safe from them.

Remember that it wasn't a living creature, it was a "choice", and also remember how we are always being admonished to "respect" any "choice" a woman makes.
Female batterer murders dog (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:13 PM May 25th, 2004 EST (#3)
"Wylie (pictured in the first mug shot below) and Walters were nabbed in the parking lot of a Kittery Dairy Queen, where they "were to make arrangements to dispose of" Dewey, police said. The dog's remains were found in the pair's truck. The women have been charged with felony burglary for the Maine break-in and may also face animal cruelty charges in New Hampshire for the drowning of Dewey, who is pictured above."

==================================================

Violent female revenge against men, when a relationship breaks up, is an epidemic that the domestic violence industry refuses to address. You have the lying domestic violence industry to thank for Dewey's death as much as anyone.

Ray

(click) What Can Women Do

(click) Vicitms Are Cheated

(Please do not scroll up the page of the linked item(s). All the info I am trying to convey is only as the page comes up initially.)
this isn't surprising (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 03:12 AM May 26th, 2004 EST (#6)
(User #700 Info)
Anyone who thinks girls can't be vicious obviously didn't know too many in high school and hasn't dated much. Anyway....

Now for an off-topic rant: the #1 worst invention of the web has been pop-up windows. However, the #2 worst invention ARE LINKS THAT POP OPEN IN NEW WINDOWS WHEN YOU CLICK ON THEM. Hey, if I wanted it in a new fucking window, I would open it in a new fucking window, thank you very much.
Re:this isn't surprising (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 06:33 AM May 26th, 2004 EST (#7)
So don't click the "Click". It is clear if you read the bold, that you are going to another page, and please keep your profanity to yourself. You have no valid complaint. IMO, people who are abusive like you were in your post are the #1 curse of the web.
Re:this isn't surprising (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:50 AM May 26th, 2004 EST (#8)
I agree. This guy is a jerk. I rather like the convenience of having the page open in a new window.

That guy should save his anger for feminists, not his fellow men. Mods, please keep the new-open-windows thing, however you do it. I like it.
you're that guy! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 04:12 PM May 29th, 2004 EST (#12)
You're the guy who was on the news who actually buys things from spammers and telemarketers, thus giving them a financial incentive to exist, and annoy the hell out of the rest of us non-morons.

I rather like the convenience of having the page open in a new window.

Its convenient in the same way that a nice, big, black cock shoved up your ass is convieninet in prison. But maybe you like that, too.
below me (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 04:09 PM May 29th, 2004 EST (#11)
(User #700 Info)
So don't click the "Click".

There was no "click".

if you read the bold

There was no bold.

that you are going to another page

It didn't say anything of the sort.

You have no valid complaint.

Such a bold statement from someone who doesn't have a clue as to what he's talking about (see above). Of course its a valid complaint: the reason websites pop open new links when you click on them is because they don't want you to leave their site. i.e. clicking on a link on Gamespot to Nvidia's site will pop open a new window rather than going there in your current one, the basic idea of hyperlinking. Well if I want to get back to your site, jackass, I'll use this little widget that was invented at least ten years ago: the fucking back button.

IMO, people who are abusive like you were in your post are the #1 curse of the web.

Bzzt. The #1 problem of the web is the way sites like to take over your screen and desktop by exploiting flaws in web browsers, like pop up window advertizements and opening links in new windows. And because there are so many mindless sheep like yourself, its taken a long time for preventative measures to become available.

please keep your profanity to yourself.

Profanity is for emphasis, and more people need to be empahtic about this. So: blow it out your ass.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]