[an error occurred while processing this directive]
No Wonder Australia Is Collapsing
posted by Thomas on 04:52 PM April 20th, 2004
News This piece is from Pru Goward, the federal Sex Discrimination Commissioner of Australia. Note the standard, feminist distortions and lies about "the greater poverty, violence and earnings disparity suffered by women." Also note that she cops the feminist attitude that generally goes along the lines of "it's men's fault" or "men can't handle strong, independent women" rather than addressing the many legitimate grievances presented by the men's movement.

Australian men might consider doing themselves a few favors: Give women as little preferential treatment as possible in the workplace; avoid marriage; do your best not to become responsible for some woman's children (by law, they won't be your children).

American Men: Brace Yourselves | A Witch-hunt at the University of Colorado?  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
just respond to men's legitimate concerns (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 09:22 PM April 20th, 2004 EST (#1)
The last thing men need, if indeed they are experiencing a crisis of masculinity, is another war with women.

There truly is no need for a war with women. The righteous struggle is against anti-male women and anti-male men. To end this struggle, give unmarried men the right to choose whether to be a father, establish affirmative action for stay-at-home fathers, eliminate sexism in family law, require due process in rape allegations, address domestic violence against men...in short, stop treating men like disposable second-class citizens.

If you want peace, work for justice!!!

Re:just respond to men's legitimate concerns (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:51 AM April 21st, 2004 EST (#2)
>"If you want peace work for justice!!!"

Well said. Very well said.

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:just respond to men's legitimate concerns (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:35 PM April 21st, 2004 EST (#5)
Usually when I hear the phrase "crisis of masculinity" uttered by a women it means that the man/men involved no longer want to kiss her/their ass. Therefore a man is suffering from a crisis of masculinity because a man wants to do what he wants and enjoys rather then be a whipping boy and cheque book to women as masculinity has been defined in the past.
They still don't get it... (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 12:11 PM April 21st, 2004 EST (#3)
No where is it mentioned how or where men can get support for their "problems".
And as usual it is "men's fault" when things don't go right.
Basicaly what we see here is the tired old mantra of "Guys just be submissive and let women run rough-shod over you and everything will be fine..." BULL s#!t!!!
And yes we DO need a MEN'S MOVEMENT! It is the only way to get justice! And we WILL have JUSTICE!
I sum up Australia and it's view of men by that God-awful VOODOO JEANS billboard that I saw about a year ago. Anyone remember that?
Well, let me refresh your memory if you don't.
This billboard depicted a woman walking two naked men on all fours like animals on two leashes. That billboard is the very OPPITOMY of Australia's view of men. and the whole male/female relationship.
So do they base this "crisis of masculinity" by the fact that Australian men are rejecting this version of "gender equity"? The only "crisis of masculinity" is if men EXEPT that version of "equality". and THAT is the very version all of us men are told we must tolerate.
I for one say; NO WAY!

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
What war? (Score:1)
by Hunchback on 02:05 PM April 21st, 2004 EST (#4)
(User #1505 Info)
The last thing men need, if indeed they are experiencing a crisis of masculinity, is another war with women.

There has been no war with feminism and definitely no war with women. In fact, it has been the unblinking support of feminism by male-headed institutions that has led to its dominance and radicalism. The very idea that criticism of its abuses has been leaking out is what motivates this dismissal of men's groups. There has never been a movement in the 19th or 20th century Western world that has gone as unopposed as modern feminism. With the exception of the Right-to-Lifers, these women have faced virtually no ORGANIZED, well-funded resistance to their machinations; so naturally, this societal carte blanche has resulted in the movement becoming more and more extremist. It is axiomatic that the greater the opposition to a social movement, the greater power the moderate wing acquires and vice versa. (Revolutions don't become radical till they've crushed the opposition.)

So for the first time in 40 years the feminazis are witnessing the genesis of a determined foe, and it is in their self-interest that it die stillborn.
Very well said! (Score:1)
by EvilPundit on 10:29 PM April 21st, 2004 EST (#6)
(User #1661 Info) http://evilpundit.com
I think you've summed it up nicely in just a few sentences.
-- Evil Pundit of Doom!
[an error occurred while processing this directive]