|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well at least the BBC was true to form. Rather than utilise the programme to explore the issues, it was the usual parade of PC acceptable commetators trotting out the same tired old feminist propaganda under the guise of a drama-doc. The Fem-Utopia of 2020 was compared to "how really dreadful things were for women in 2004" - and once again the old fossils were dragged out.
In one scene the eldest daughter of the main character became an MP and was championing greater male participation in professionalised childcare - obviously she forgot that men who express an interest in such activities are usually branded 'paedophiles'. Convenient amnesia?
The 50+ central female character decided to go for another child and was offered the option of embryos conceived with her ex-husband. The male doctor was concerned that she might feel 'uncomfortable' with this option - not the issue of husbands consent or basic human rights !!
Ultimately the premise of post-menopausal conception without male intervention was floated and largely discredited.
IF...women ruled the World; wake BBC they already do !!!
In a world dominated by women with men redundant ? Thank God I'll be dead. How could any sane human being live in a world of in-bred, self-obsessed, aggressive whinging 'harpies' with PMS !!! (shudders)
When the men have all gone - who will they have to blame for their pathetic miserable existences ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:06 PM April 2nd, 2004 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
"In 2020 women are outperforming men academically, socially, technologically and even biologically,"
I question the last two, and socially? Is that because it's the social system of the femisupremacist, a social system where there are 700 women's studies programs on college campuses in America, 270 women's commissions in America, and comparable through out the western world? I suppose the femisupremacy agenda will have gone further in the U.N. by then too.
I concede women will be outperforming men, they are now. Schools are just too sexist and hostile against men. No student loans without registering with selective service (men only). Some states won't even give a man a driver's license without registering with the ss. Then you have Title IX and femi-supremacist sexual harassment laws. In all of the aritcles I have read about education in the past year, they have all been slanted heavily to female needs and wants. They brag about how well females are doing in certain subjects (reaching mastery over boys) and then complain about the few areas where girls are still not ahead. They also blame boys for there inabilities in education as if they are somehow personally resoponsible for there failures. Girls of course only do poorly, becuase the "system is working against them."
(click) Schools Should Care
(click) Schools Are Against Males
(click) Schools Fail Males
(Please do not scroll up the page of the linked items. All the info I am trying to convey is only as the page comes up initially.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:07 PM April 2nd, 2004 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guys...stop acting like this is any sort of real threat. Take a deep breath...look around you at your surroundings...the building you are in...the furniture you are sitting on...the city you are in...subtract from your surroundings everything created by the hands and effort of men...what is left....immagine the consequences of a one week general strike by men.
Scenarios of penis guillotines set up in the Place de la Concorde are pure bulldyke wishfull thinking.
Elected officials are only slightly more permanent than calandars.
Don't even dignify this sort of horseshit with any kind of attention.
Read some Camille Paglia
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
