|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What bothers me about this article are 2 things. The first being that she was already convicted of statutory rape in 2000 and is already out on parole. I am not a legal expert, but how long does a person usually go to jail for after committing Statutory Rape. And, on that note, isn't a parole condition usually not to have contact with children? I am going to write to the paper tonight and ask these questions. This case reminds me of the woman who got caught having sex with a 14 year old, who had impregnated her, gotten out of jail after a laughably short time, and gotten pregnant AGAIN.
The second issue I wanted to bring up was the fact that the article seems to be saying Statutory rape, but the boy said that she got him high and "forced herself" on him. That, folks, is the LITERAL definition of sexual assault. How many stories have we all read where a woman or girl was "plied with alcohol/drugs" and then forced to have sex. If a man "gets a woman drunk" (and to me it's usually a mutual decision to drink together) he can be charged. But this boy said she forced herself on him, after taking him miles from home (where was he supposed to go if he wanted to leave: READ : POWER POSTITION). Do I honestly think he enjoyed the sex most of the time. Yep, sure do. No doubt in MY mind. Just trying to be real here, but he DID say that he was forced on one occasion and THAT is RAPE folks. We are told that a woman's prior consent on a previous occasion is not consent on every occasion and that she has the inalienable right to say no at any time. Why is this being ignored in this case?
Hope I added to the discussion.
Peace
Steven
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
