|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If this is a state conviction, the article didn't say, then this monster just has to play the "abuse card" and the Governor will more than likely issue a pardon. Also using the sympathy angle so she can be with her poor little cancer stricken daughter.
I give her no more than a year tops and she is back on the street.
"""""" French's attorney said her 3-year-old daughter, who has cancer, will be dead and her 10-year-old son will be grown by the time French is freed from prison.
Aarons said French turned down a plea deal that carried a minimum four-year prison sentence."""""""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is stil good that they took it seriously enough to give HER as harsher sentance than the MEN. Is there anyway of writing to the court and thanking them for this? Postitive reinforcement!
TBQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.co.santa-fe.nm.us/commission.html
Here is a link to the SanteFe commissioners....I think this is where you would send e-mails about this, or am I off?-I am not real up on government roles, ;-(
TBQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SanteFe City Council
http://sfweb.ci.santa-fe.nm.us/executive/Council/i ndex.asp
SanteFe newpaper, letter to the editor
http://www.sfnewmexican.com/main.asp?Search=1&Arti cleID=36237&SectionID=2&SubSectionID=&S=1
I looked over the letters to the editor, and the overwhelming majority are in support of the sentencing. People are getting sick of women getting away with murder.
The Biscuit Queen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those letters are well worth reading. Society is evolving, for the moment and in regard to gender fairness at least, in a good direction. The men and women who posted were generally very in favor of the verdict and in more than one case indicated that they may be growing sick of seeing women getting off easy just because they're female.
We are getting through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a response I got from your Mayor in London or someone from his office regarding the David Chick protest.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mayor [mailto:mayor@london.gov.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:47 AM
> To: florom@citigroup.com
> Subject: MGLA061103-7918: RE : David Chick - Mayors comments
>
>
> Dear Mr Floro
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> My overriding concern in this matter was the degree of chaos Mr Chick's
> protest was causing to London's transport network.
>
> The bridge and surrounding roads were closed on the instructions of the
> police and it was my view that his protest should not be allowed to
> inconvenience tens of thousands of Londoners.
>
> The protest led to large swathes of London's transport system becoming
> severely congested with motorists and buses unable to cross Tower Bridge.
>
> I have always upheld the right to peaceful protest but it is also my
> responsibility to ensure that Londoners are able to go about their business
> without being unreasonably disrupted by a single individual.
>
> Yours sincerely
> Ken Livingstone
> Mayor of London
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
