Men Putting Down the Remote

	posted by Hombre on Tuesday November 25, @09:58PM from the Well-what-the-heck-did-they-think-would-happen? dept.
	frank h writes "This is the second time in as many months I've seen an article on this topic. It seems that Neilsen is saying that TV viewership among males 18-34 is dropping sharply, and the networks are blaming Neilsen's research methods (!@@!). They simply can't see (or refuse to acknowledge) that the emperor is nekkid." In a related story it seems a local newpaper has lost much of its Jewish demographic after repeatedly portraying Jews as bumblers, depicting violence against Jews as humor, condemning Jews as dangerous, and repeatedly stating that any problems which affect Jews are unimportant and whining since a lot of the businesses in the world are owned by Jews and besides that talking about their problems won't get them laid. Experts are stumped.

<  Turner Touts Female-Dominated Foundation | Stormy Future of Marriage  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Philadelphia Inquirer mentioned it also on Sunday (Score:1) by Boy Genteel on Tuesday November 25, @10:13PM EST (#1) (User #1161 Info) I'll look for the link soon.

The name's of the innocent change (Score:0) by Anonymous User on Wednesday November 26, @01:47AM EST (#2) When are these people going to catch on? In a previous post I took a document from Hitler's propaganda minister, Goebbels and just replaced the words “Jew” or “Jewish” with “man” or “male.” Is america treating men like Hitler treated Jews? Yes, but not to the full degree of horror that they experienced, at least not yet. However, amercia is well on it's way. The only reason that we aren't further along is because men are useful slaves to women and government. Here is Goebbels list and the link to the actual document on the web. Again, I have just changed the words referring to "Jews" to words referring to "men," and left a few of the items out for brevity. There’s plenty left to chill the blood. Sincerely, Ray -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- --------- Therefore, we must say again and yet again: 1. The males are our destruction. They want to destroy women. This plan must be blocked. 2. There are no distinctions between men. Each man is a sworn enemy of the feminist movement. If he does not make his hostility plain, it is only from cowardice and slyness, not because he loves us. 3. The males are to blame for each woman who falls. They must pay for it. 5. The males enjoy the protection of our enemies. That is all the proof we need to show how harmful they are for women. 6. The males are the enemy's agents among us. She who stands by them aids the enemy. 7. The males have no right to claim equality with us. If they wish to speak on the streets, in lines outside shops or in public transportation, they should be ignored, not only because their are simply wrong, but because they are males who have no right to a voice in the community. 8. If the males appeal to your sentimentality, realize that they are hoping for your forgetfulness, and let them know that you see through them and hold them in contempt. 9. A decent enemy will deserve our generosity after we have won. The males however are not a decent enemy, though they try to seem so. 10. The males are responsible. The treatment they receive from us is hardly unjust. They have deserved it all. It is the job of the government to deal with them. No one has the right to act on his own, but each has the duty to support the state's measures against the males, to defend them with others, and to avoid being misled by any male tricks. The security of the state requires that of us all. -------------------------------------------------- Here is the link to the real author, and his original words if you dare to read them: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb1.htm

[an error occurred while processing this directive]