|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think that's a point that a lot of people seem to miss. True, when I was in college, if a female professor accidentally flashed me and then later even apologized for it I'd have to totally hate her to report it and try to ruin her career. I think the same is true with most guys, no matter how unwanted that glimpse of female sexuality might be.
It is my opinion that these girls were probably not extremely offended either initially, although they might have worked themselves up to it later. What I believe is the case is that these girls felt obligated to be offended, and also obligated to take action. After all, the thinking goes, if they let him get away with this, aren't they partially to blame if sometime down the road he rapes some girl? Shouldn't there be a zero tolerance policy on unwanted male sexuality?
Its become my contention of late that neither man-hating nor feminism is the primary enemy of men's rights. I see those as lesser enemies than female elitism and the sense of obligation to mistreat men, either by overzealous vigilance in the fight against the evils men *might* do, or by pro-women discrimination to make up for some vaguely conceived advantages men might have.
After all, its one thing for someone to have to hate you to try and ruin your career, (and indeed your life as in this case where he's been teaching for 40 years), its another entirely for them to feel entitled or obligated to do so whether they hate you or not. Hell hath no fury like one who already felt justified in abusing you scorned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, couldn't resist that ;)
Seriously though, sometimes a man can get an involuntary erection. If this occurs in public, it may be embarassing, but it shouldn't be grounds for prosecution.
It's good to see that sanity prevailed in this case.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
