This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, imagine what a male would be looking at for similar charges.
Now- any bets that she doesn't get a slap-on-the-wrist piece of probation?
Something they didn't mention in there, BTW, is that not only did she deny a father two counts of being with his duaghters, she denied two daughters their fathers.
Were I the judge, constrained under law - she would serve two terms consecutively - with the full measure of the penalty for each.
Were I the judge, unconstrained by law - life in prison with no possibility of parole, and her daughters would not be permitted to visit or call her, or vice versa.
* Putting the SMACKDOWN on Feminazis since 1989! *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Now- any bets that she doesn't get a slap-on-the-wrist piece of probation? "
I'll take you one further, she'll get a lifetime movie made about her terrible hard life on the run, and eventual martyrdom in the form of spending three weeks at the county jail.
"and her daughters would not be permitted to visit or call her, or vice versa. "
can one do that, since the daughters are both adults? granted, this is your own measures of punishments, just wondering if there have been circumstances in the US of prevented visiting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If she'd jumped up and declared child abuse, spousal abuse, whatever, she would've been able to prevent those two girls from seeing their father legally. She has this vague "for their safety" claim, nothing provable. Will 'women's intuition' be evidence now of future abuse?
Being cynical and mean, let's say she wanted to punish him for something. Him getting the house, her not enough in alimony, whatever. Takes the children. The immediate thought is "no mother would be so selfish as to use her children as divorce pawns!" watch 'em. Where's that site, the one with the woman admitting she just 'wanted' full custody, so she made up a false allegation of abuse? makes me hurt.
And guys, unless you saw something I didn't, it's 13 years, not 16.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|