|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...is that its quite possible that the 17 year old boy might end up spending more time in jail than the women who raped him. He lied about having seen her, which the prosecutors called obstruction of justice. That would then mean that he'd be in violation of his parol for an earlier drug offese and could be sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Meanwhile I expect the woman cop a plea and get "treatment" so she spends little if any time in jail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"That would then mean that he'd be in violation of his parol for an earlier drug offese and could be sentenced to 12 years in prison."
Why can't he use the arguement that's always used. He was afraid of his abuser would hurt him again. He was in fear for his life. Ha!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I thought that sex offenders were not allowed to live with children. How can a woman who rapes an eighth-grader be trusted to raise a child?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the child turns out to be the eighth-grader's the rapist can collect child support from the eighth-grader and use it to buy her beer and cigarettes if she so choses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is amazing:
Paulsrud had been charged Wednesday with five counts of sexual assault of a student on accusations of having more than 50 sexual encounters with the teenager, beginning when he was 16, in her SUV in the school parking lot, at her home on her husband's bowling nights and elsewhere.
On her husbands bowling night? If this were a man he would be hung up for cheating on his wife but the husband isn't even mentioned except to say that his wife cheated on him while he was bowling.
When Paulsrud appeared in court Friday afternoon to face the new bail-jumping charge, her lawyer said reporters were to blame for the now-suspended teacher's actions.
What will they think of next as an excuse for women to committ crimes? It's the reporters fault that she is having sex with an underage boy on her husband's bowling night. How weird is that???? I can't imagine a man getting that sort of treatment. Yes, Mr Smiths lawyers claimed that it was the medias fault that he had sex with the 16 year old girl. LOL!!! This is really bizarro!
Stand Your Ground Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
" Yes, Mr Smiths lawyers claimed that it was the medias fault that he had sex with the 16 year old girl. LOL!!! This is really bizarro! "
Heh, maybe she's pissed because all of the publicity finally got her suspended. Is that with pay or without?
The Justice system is a total joke. How can anyone respect whats going on in them. Of course Im speaking of Canada from my experience. Looks like the US is pretty bad too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From an article: "her lawyer said reporters were to blame for the now-suspended teacher's actions."
From Tom: "What will they think of next as an excuse for women to committ crimes?"
Now, Tom, you know that women and three-month-old infants aren't responsible for their actions. When women do something wrong, society is charged with the task of finding the person, people, or system (such as Patriarchy) that is responsible. This is not a simple task. We should cut them some slack. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Wednesday March 12, @11:21AM EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
((("This is not a simple task. We should cut them some slack.")))
...I'll "slack" them...,
Thundercloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Thomas for helping me see the error of my ways. Temporary psychosis I suppose. How dare I think even for a moment that men have rights and women have responsibilities. I keep getting those two mixed up....
Stand Your Ground Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When I was 13 I had a woman cook at the Methodist Home I was in give me some memories that I will never forget. I did not feel victomized, nor did I feel abused. I did not run and tell everyone about it either. Situations are different, but an adult is supposed to be responsible under the law, regardless of gender. For the boys to suffer for the weakness of an adult is the true crime, and the system is the perpetraitor. The fact that the woman cheated on her husband, well that is between her and her husband. Again, another victim, if she has children, and the poor guy divorces her, unless he gets custody he will be another victim of the system. The whole thing stinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am consistantly amazed at the amount of men I encounter who confess to their first experience being at an early age with an older female.
My own was at the age of 12, when the parents left for a weekend getaway. being that young, the "girl down the street," a high school senior, stayed and watched my brother and I.
I knew at the time something was wrong, but the age old line was used, to shame me into compliance, namely, "What's the matter? Don't you like girls?"
What's that say? Where's the threat? Do me or you must be gay. You must be a little faggot. And If you don't, this may get around, and everyone will call you a little faggot. Nope, no threat, no coercion, no rape there.
That's what rape is, the threat of "Have sex with me or I will hurt you." This threat doesn't need to be a knife at the throat. It doesn't have to be a loaded gun, a beating. Do me or I'll hurt you.
I think this is a lot more common than most people realize, and it's especially damaging to the male psyche, especially at a young age. Nobody wants to admit that a girl forced them to do anything. So they convince themselves they went along with it, or it was their idea. The telling point on it is, though, that the vast and overwhelming majority of the men who have confessed this do so sheepishly. They can't meet the eyes. It's mumbled, a lot of times qualified with, "I don't really count that...."
Statuatory rape, contrary to the canard about it being a statement of property rights, is about the advantage taken of someone emotionally immature, someone to inexperienced to make good judgement. We're horrified when we hear of a 13 year old girl - who probably is sexually mature - being led down the primrose path by some old coot who promises her things that he not only has no intention of providing, but no means to do so. The tales of this are legion. In many cases she does like him, even thinks she's "in love." She certainly walks willingly into his bedroom, climbs in bed, and does what he wants. She probably even has orgasms, and enjoys herself.
But it's rape. And it is rape, because he's decieving her, he's manipulating her, he's taking advantage of her immaturity, and emotionally coercing her. Turn the tables, though, and suddenly, because the victim is a young boy -
I don't need to tell you. The news stories are full of it. He wanted it. He enjoyed it. I don't see any marks or bruises. Hmmm. Sounds like the excuses used by any traditional rapist, "She wanted it so bad, man!"
The whole things stinks? Dave, that's the understatement of the year.
---- Burn, Baby, Burn ----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the Baskerville article, "One girl tells a Toronto newspaper of her career plans: 'I'm going to marry a really rich guy, then divorce him,' she says. 'But first I'm going to have his kids, so I get child support.'"
Gee, if I were a young man, I'd be doing all I could to find a woman to marry. It would be so romaaaantic.
Remember, if you are a young man, you have little or nothing to gain from getting married. And you have everything to lose, including your life if your ex-wife and the legal system drive you to suicide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Remember, if you are a young man, you have little or nothing to gain from getting married."
The same goes for older guys. I'm 38 and never married. If I ever do decide to tie the knot, it will be with an un-Americanized immigrant. I have met some of them and they and their families have been truly a joy to associate with. I am seeing quite a few of them in my locale; they don't buy into the man-hating claptrap put out by the medias and their femmunist masters. And by the way, I have heard them calling women who marry for money what they really are: dishonest prostitutes.
High atop my perch, dropping bird-bombs on the feminuts - Freebird
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I ever do decide to tie the knot, it will be with an un-Americanized immigrant.
The problem, as I see it, is that the same laws will still apply. Sure, if she doesn't make a religion out of hating men (i.e. she isn't a feminist), she may not be as likely to destroy you on as little as a whim. But she will still probably learn about the laws, if she hasn't already, and then if she gets tired of you, or you ever fail to behave the way she thinks you should...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"But she will still probably learn about the laws, if she hasn't already, and then if she gets tired of you, or you ever fail to behave the way she thinks you should..."
I know around here that feminists work hard around the clock to reach immigrant women. They are also working hard to get to the rural parts as well. All lies and propaganda. They also feed women the power advantage line 'Baby you can have it all, just divorce him'. Classic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I know around here that feminists work hard around the clock to reach immigrant women. They are also working hard to get to the rural parts as well. All lies and propaganda. They also feed women the power advantage line 'Baby you can have it all, just divorce him'. Classic."
Dan and Thomas, you're exactly right as much as I hate to say it. I try to think there is some hope, but until women en mass begin to reject the femmunist manifesto in its entirety, the situation can only get worse.
Heck, maybe we should find another country. Any takers?
High atop my perch - Freebird
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
