[an error occurred while processing this directive]
MD District Commissioner Referendum a Danger to Men's Rights
posted by Scott on Tuesday October 08, @02:42PM
from the domestic-violence dept.
Domestic Violence Dan Scott writes, "If you are a Maryland voter be warned that a serious threat to your basic civil rights has been offered for your approval this election year in November 2002. The referendum is asking to you amend the State of Maryland’s Constitution to allow District Commissioners after normal business hours to remove people from "their homes" under the guise of domestic violence accusations." See the Read More section below for the rest of Dan's submission.

"Under current law, a hearing must occur before a judge, to decide whether a person can be removed from "their home" based on an accusation of domestic violence or for a mental health examination. While the idea of protecting "people" from violent family members or cohabitants sounds reasonable on the surface to normal people, are you aware this is not what is actually happening?

Are you aware that when someone brings an "accusation" of domestic violence, that absolutely no proof or witness(es) are required for a judge and by extension the proposed District Commissioner to issue a protective order removing a person from "their home"? They literally take the accusers word for it! Are you aware that the defendant is "not" at the hearing when the decision to have them removed from "their own home" is currently made? It is called Ex Parte

Are you aware that once removed from "your home" that you are made homeless for seven days until a hearing is held to determine your "guilt"? You have seven days in which to find a lawyer to defend yourself! We say your "guilt" since the majority (94% in one jurisdiction) of domestic violence decisions result in a "finding" against the defendant (male) under the civil rules of evidence where accusations are held on the same level of substance as evidence and witness(es). Did you realize that when a man is accused of domestic violence, the determination of guilt was already made at a hearing you were not allowed to attend? The hearing seven days later is merely a formality in most cases unless the woman fails to show up for the hearing.

Are you aware that the decisions currently made virtually targets only one group of individuals? Yes, only one group, men. We contend these are civil rights violations based on gender. Are you aware that domestic violence is committed with equal frequency by both men and women? Are you aware that divorce lawyers use the Domestic Violence Act as a cynical legal ploy to gain Custody and Use & Possession of the residence for divorcing women? Who do you think sponsored this referendum? The Divorce Lawyer Lobby. Who do you think stands to literally profit from round the clock removal of men from their homes? The Divorce Lawyers! Get the facts before you make a decision. See www.geocities.com/fightbigotry2002 (Maryland Judicial Equality Committee)

Are you aware of the current practice in the mis-use of the bail bond system to deprive men of the financial ability to retain a lawyer and remove men from their homes after hours. The Maryland guidelines for bond issuance is consistently disregarded by Court Commissioners in some cases forcing men to plead guilty in order to obtain freedom from incarceration. The Court Commissioners will set disproportionately high bail and force the accused to obtain a non-refundable 10% bond from a bondsman. Bail in some cases have been set up to $15,500+. In some cases, men have been forced to stay awake for 30 hours before being released on bond. Particularly troublesome is the practice of charging men under the criminal statute, forcing them to post bond, i.e. 10% non-refundable bond, dropping the criminal charge and then charging them under the Domestic Violence Act during business hours where the likelihood of obtaining a conviction is higher. According to a recent study of the bail bond system "Under Maryland's pretrial release rules, the overwhelming majority of these detainees should have been offered less onerous alternatives and been released without bondsmen."

Do you really want to give District Commissioners the power to remove you from "your own home" without a hearing, or even being presented with evidence or witness(es)? Are you prepared to give up your rights of property and become homeless as has happened to thousands of men in Maryland over the last six years due to the discriminatory mis-use of the Domestic Violence Act?

Pass this email on to your friends, they deserve to be told and warned about a threat to their civil liberties.

We urge you to Vote No to the District Commissioner Referendum!

Contact Us: Fightbigotry2002@yahoo.com
Maryland Judicial Equality Committee
"

Time for Action on Biased Heart Disease Programs | MANN Chat: Integrated Men  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
...and fascism differs in what way? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Tuesday October 08, @05:51PM EST (#1)
And yes, I do understand...

...having had fraudulent "abuse" allegations used to dispose of me while my ex decided to begin a relationship with another man.

Daily, how many thousands of men have to have their civil liberties trampled upon, their freedom striped away, their jobs and careers jeapordized, their money fined, and their homes and children removed so that there is one woman protected from a real abuser? How is this any different than profiling Muslims entering this country since 9-11?

Abuse HAS to be proven, not stated! The system is broken. Everyone with ANY common sense knows this is true.

STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS WHILE YOU CAN!
Re:...and fascism differs in what way? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Wednesday October 09, @07:51PM EST (#5)
Daily, how many thousands of men have to have their civil liberties trampled upon, their freedom striped away, their jobs and careers jeapordized, their money fined, and their homes and children removed so that there is one woman protected from a real abuser? How is this any different than profiling Muslims entering this country since 9-11?

The difference is, most persons are more afraid of being attacked by screetching, hate-spewing femi-nazis than they are of being attacked by terrorists. Time to show more courage!

   
What political party (Score:1)
by Ray on Tuesday October 08, @11:17PM EST (#2)
(User #873 Info)
What political party is predominately in power in Maryland?

What party is/are:

Federal senators
      " representatives

Governor

State Senators

    " Representatives

Just curious.

Ray


Re:What political party (Score:1)
by Remo on Tuesday October 08, @11:59PM EST (#3)
(User #732 Info)
Ray:

"Progressive" liberal Democrats run my state as they have since before I was born. I'm 31 now, and in my entire life we have never had a Republican Governor.

Md's legislature has a nation-wide reputation for corruption -- almost as bad as those in California, and New Jersey. The current Attorney General is Joseph Curran -- a guy who calls for the elimination of handguns, among his many liberal causes.

The lame-duck governor is Parris Spend..er Glendenning, a former Prince Georges county exec. He was known for ruining its econonmy by running up a huge deficit. After 8 years of Glendenning in office (where he pulled such tricks as giving cushy union jobs out left and right) Md now has a budget deficit.

His protoge is Kathleen Kennedy Townsend-- yes, one of the Kennedy family. She's supported by nearly every liberal, labor, and women's group you can think of, not to mention her name recognition. Her campaign has already pulled out the race card, and I'm sure the sex card will be next.

It's nothing short of a miracle that former Congressman Bob Ehrlich is raising nearly as much money as her, and the race is actually considered a dead heat. I can only pray that he wins.

From our standpoint as people concerned about men's issues, I will say that both candidates offer advantages and disadvantages. Stll, in the end, I think Townsend's loyalties are to the feminists who support her so fervently, and Bob is far more open-minded. I can do my part by voting for him and urging others to do so. Could any of you guys say a few prayers for us in Md?

Remo
maryland politics (Score:1)
by Tom on Wednesday October 09, @06:23AM EST (#4)
(User #192 Info) http://www.standyourground.com
Great to see other Maryland men here on this board!

To add to the doom and gloom...in my area our reprersentative is Connie Morrella who has been treacherous towards men for years. She was one of the originators of the VAWA and has balked at any requests no matter how small that she support isses in congress that are male friendly. I was so happy to hear that she has a good chance of losing this election...until I read in the Washington Post that NOW has endorsed her opponent! Van Hollen. Frying pan fire? Sheeeesh!
Stand Your Ground Forum
Unconstitutional (Score:1)
by incredibletulkas on Friday October 11, @03:05AM EST (#6)
(User #901 Info)
This bill is unconstitutional on its face; a person can only be deprived of liberty as part of an injunction in anticipation of a trial, otherwise it's undue legal process, and a violation of the 5th and 14th amendments.
It might be a good idea to write the legislators and governor of Maryland and inform them of this.
'hope I'm spelling this right, 'not good at German (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Sunday October 13, @02:43AM EST (#7)
...Sieg-heil, everyone, Sieg-hiel.

        Thundercloud.
          'Hoka-hey!'
[an error occurred while processing this directive]