|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And how many of them still maintain their innocence?
How many are in prison because some cunt didnt have the moral implications to admit she was screwing around on her boyfriend or that she felt like a slut the next day so it was easier to blame someone else for her infidelities than to take responsibility her self.
On another note these femicunts want to blame men for being a father and for *not* being a father. So which is it? Should men be a part of their son's lives or not?
So are they doing studies on how the mother was with her daughter when daughters commit sexual deeds? http://www.whengirlsdoit.com/index.html
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One again in this story we see the modus operandi of the radical feminists. The only time a radical feminist isn't lying is when she's doing something that doesn't involve words.
O.K. you caught me, it could be possible I'm overlooking some other ways they can lie. I just can't think of them right NOW. Wait a minute... ...dreams, thoughts, MIMING. No lie is beyond the power of the radical feminist to create it, or find a medium to convey it.
Insanity is too mild a term to describe the consistently delusional world of vicious fabrication, in which the radical feminists live their lives of anguish. They dwell in a realm devoid of reason, wherein their focus of blame is all things male. The self-loathing and self-hatred they naturally feel for their vile evilness is then more easily projected onto and transferred to men.
Once again, the dung heap is the moral high ground of radical feminism, from that pinnacle of repugnancy their moral and ethical insight, along with their whole philosophy, spirals downward into progressively more degenerate thought and behavior.
If you think all this sounds a little harsh, then consider too that this comes from a guy with a strong sense of humor, but I can't laugh when I talk about that scum of the earth.
When I see what radical feminists do to innocent men and boys, then Misogyny becomes a euphemism, compared to the real depth of disgust I feel for those degenerate, sexist monsters. They are hate criminals, "par excelon." The KKK, the Nazis, etc. need take notes from these demons to reach their level of proficiency in committing hate crime.
Sincerely,
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Friday September 13, @01:16AM EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Why am I not suprised to hear that it is (as always) the fault of MEN and MEN alone, when ANYTHING goes "awry"?
Even when it is the MOTHER to blame or NOBODY at all to blame, some how it is ALWAYS Men's fault.
Not just SOME Men, Not even MOST Men, it is ALWAYS ALL Men, collectively and absolutely!
What do the Marx-fems think we Men do...? Do they think we all get together at some secret, smoke-filled meeting place to plot and scheam against all Female kind?!?
If ANYONE gets together in a group and plots and scheams against the opposite sex it is WOMEN!
What do you call the Feminist groups?!?
I am so "FREAKING" SICK of this garbage.
I mean talk about a case of Tranceferance.
You all know what...?
Just watch. One day a giant METEOR or ASTEROID is going to hit the earth. Though there will be no way in creation ANYONE could POSSIBLY be responsible for this, Some how, some WAY, you can bet your @$$ Feminists and like-minded women will find SOME way to say it's ALL MEN'S FAULT!!!
You watch.
I don't know who's WORSE, U.S. Feminists or Aussie feminists.
Either way I hope the Aussie feminists are set upon by a bunch of rabbid KANGAROOS!
Oh, Yeah, They'll blame men for THAT too!
Thundercloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Friday September 13, @02:26AM EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
B.T.W. there's something else I want to mention.
This will be news to everyone here.
But I have studied for several years the subject of "Socialy, deveiant, criminal behavior."
One of the most out-standing findings I came accross was this;
That MANY if not MOST men that commited sexual violent acts (against women) were, (A) often raised in a single parent house hold. The single parent almost always being the MOTHER.
(B) That MANY of these men as young boys were raised by a very "DOMINANT-type" woman. and\or were surrounded by "Dominant-type" women, through out their childhood. I.E. other women in the family or school teachers, Etc.
When these boys grow into Men, it is with the feeling of powerlessness. and a "carry-over anger" at the Mother and\or other "Dominant" female figures in his life, growing up.
In the mind of the rapist or "sexual preditor", "Women" deserve "punishment" for what "they" did to him. Now that he is an adult he must show them that they no longer have "power" over him. And the way to do this, in his mind, is to make THEM powerless.
How many times have we heared that "Rape is an act of Violence and power over the victim"?
It is not just a cliche, it is the TRUTH!
With THAT said.
How can it be then, that it is "Bad Fathers" that are TOATALLY to blame for "Male sex offenders"?
When the majority of "male sex offenders" come from single mother families???
It MAY be more realistic to say; "Over-bearing, bad MOTHERS are to blame for Male sexual offenders.".
But, Oh,NO, We can NEVER blame the Female for ANYTHING!
Even when nearly and in some cases ALL the evidence points SQUARELY at HER!
Some how, some way, It is ALWAYS Men's fault.
Well, that's "TOLLERANCE" for you.
Thundercloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, there is no rabies in Australia :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Friday September 13, @08:01PM EST (#10)
|
|
|
|
|
((("Hey, there is no rabies in Australia :)")))
Yeah, I know. I was just being mean.
Besides, I know there are "trolls" out there that would take my comment to be "Violence against women". So If I used an "empty threat", I figured they'd have less ground to stand on.
Well, rabid or not, I'd be happy if someone just THREW a KANGAROO on them. (^-^)
Thundercloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, rabid or not, I'd be happy if someone just THREW a KANGAROO on them. (^-^)
Heheh!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ray wrote:
Insanity is too mild a term to describe the consistently delusional world of vicious fabrication, in which the radical feminists live their lives of anguish. They dwell in a realm devoid of reason, wherein their focus of blame is all things male. The self-loathing and self-hatred they naturally feel for their vile evilness is then more easily projected onto and transferred to men.
Narcissism seems to be the term we're looking for. I'm reading a critique of postmodern poststructuralism of which radical feminism is a virulent sub-category. The author calls this boomeritis since so many Baby Boomers are infected with it.
"For the sad fact is, feminism in the hands of boomeritis became a real piece of work. The many good tenets of feminism were taken up and injected with a dose of narcissism that, attempting to account for its own lack of triumph in the world, decided it was the world's fault. And the world was the world of males, period. Latching onto the panoply of boomeritis tools--from social constructivism to Foucauldian genealogy to deconstruction--boomeritis feminism produced treatise after treatise on the sheepification of women and the pigification of men, thus ascribing to all females the lack of intelligence and lack of strength with which emotional narcissism greets the world, and ascribing to all males the lack of care and lack of love that resides in every narcissist's heart."
http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/boomeritis/ endnotes/ch6-1.cfm/xid,2819670/yid,23776392
Larry
Proud member of the Sperm Cartel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"the sheepification of women and the pigification of men"
Hmmm...
It seems to me that as this view has come to dominate the mainstream over the past 30 years, both men and women have tended to react defensively, saying internally:
"I am not a pig!"
"I am not a sheep!"
So they set out to prove it by their actions. We get men being wimps (not-pigs) and women being bitches (not-sheep) simply to avoid the accusations that radical feminism, now mainstream, has made of everyone.
In effect, we get the pigification of women and the sheepification of men who would otherwise just be themselves.
Bumper sticker idea
Men are not pigs. Women are not sheep.
T-shirt idea
Front:
I am not a pig. You are not a sheep. So...
Back:
Why don't we do it in the road?
Larry
Proud member of the Sperm Cartel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blame the man. Make men responsible for the choices women make. Same old, same old.
Let me tell you true, young Jedi: Behind every worthless man is a worthless mother.
Think about it. You can't really say that about fathers, mainly because men are not allowed to be a part of their children's lives. Men are routinely driven out of their children's lives, restricted in access and contact, and allowed no opinion in how the children are raised, let alone real and active input and participation.
It's a no brainer. And until the gynocratic monopoly on "female ownership" of children is broken, there's nowhere else for the blame to go but on Bad Mothers.
---- Burn, Baby, Burn ----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, in USA ~25% of those in prison for sex crimes are probably innocent. In Canada the number may be higher but those summarily convicted with no evidence usually get one year unlike USA (10-20 years).
The other important factor is that of those guilty over 90% are criminally insane. Why would a normal person commit such a vile attack on a woman if he will pay for it with 10 years of his life? But then most other violent offenders may also be insane. Insane female criminals like Andrea Yates and Susan Smith do get public sympathy but not male criminals.
The third factor is that those who attack men are generally not prosecuted. Statistically boys suffer 40% of sexual abuse although only 2% of men are homosexual. Yet speaking up against gay community is politically incorrect. Also 300,000 men are under constant sexual abuse in US prisons because guards do nothing about it.
PUNISHMENT AND CRIME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do agree that you'd have to be insane in several ways to commit an act of sexual abuse, but maybe you should elaborate on your idea that the gay community is responsible for the sexual abuse of boys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see where John said that, but sodomy is sodomy. If you commit homosexual sex acts voluntarily, you are practicing homosexuality. If you do so with children, you're a pedophile, too. If you only practice homosexuality in pursuit of your pedophiliac fetisjh, and are heterosexual with adults, you're bisexual and have a whole nother collection of neurosis and psychosis.
That's what's un-PC. They gay community is eager to claim someone as being gay if they write a book or discover a serum, but want to disavow someone who molests children. Not both ways, so sorry. Have sex with males as a male, have sex with females as a female - use genetalia that matches your own for sexual gratification, and you're homosexual. If that genetyalia is immature, you're a pedophile TOO - not "instead of."
---- Burn, Baby, Burn ----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bold statement, Gonzo. It flies in the face of PC. I would like to discuss it more with you, but I can't email you by clicking on your link, because I don't use Outlook. I'd go into it here, but I really don't want to stray way off topic. If you wouldn't mind a discussion about it, my email address is RB77@worldnet.att.net and I would welcome a message from you. However, if you would rather not, I certainly understand that as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday September 14, @12:48PM EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
Gonzo is the LAST person to cower before the POLITICALY CORRECT bozos.
I'm with you, Gonzo.
If you are male and have sex with ANOTHER male, regardless of age difference, YOU ARE A HOMOSEXUAL, piriod, End of discussion!
It doesn't matter if it is sex with an adult male or a male CHILD. either way it is sex with another MALE! The very DEFINEITION of homosexuality.
The SAME goes for FEMALES!
If you are male and have sex with a female child, you are a heterosexual pedophile. piriod.
If you are male and have sex with a male child, you are a HOMOSEXUAL pedophile. piriod.
Again ,the SAME goes for females.
For crying out loud, WHY do we always have to explain things like this, when the ansewers are so OBVIOUS?!?
Thundercloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't have to be offline, I'll stand by what I say. If you have sex with members of the same sex, you are a homosexual. if you have sex with members of the opposite sex, you are a heterosexual. If you have no sexual preference and will have sex with anyone you are bisexual.
If you have sex with children, you're a pedophile.
The latter isn't exclusive to any of the first three.
It doesn't seem all that bold or radical to me, man, just plain common sense. I've taught for many years. I've seen real abuse, by men and women. Abuse of female children by women tend to progess as lesbian sex acts, abuse of male children by men are done in a homosexual fashion. When the opposite sexes are involved, it follows the pattern of heterosexual copulation.
It really seems to be a no brainer, but count on the PC gang to overcomplicate it.
---- Burn, Baby, Burn ----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"It really seems to be a no brainer, but count on the PC gang to overcomplicate it."
Does 'PC' stand for 'Propaganda and Censorship'?
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.... in reply to a sceptic of reality:
http://news.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=&action=m&b oard=37138530&tid=nmsexcrimedc&sid=37138530&mid=34 &thr=34&cur=34
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
