|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This hate group does not have the right to call itself an organization for women, Certainly not a national one. The n-o-w's hypocracy is so staunch and blatent its like looking through wet toilet paper. You won't see this information posted on any board or magazine with the same editorial that says "we denied women access to higher posistions". They are a hate group that is more interested in murder and the denial of rights to an entire birth group "namely men". The push for gendercide and their own special priveledges.
I knew I would eventually turn you guys onto the iwf babes sooner or later. I'm going to post a url to their "Standards for Evaluating Gender Bias Studies"
http://www.iwf.org/news/010307.shtml
This is something I think is both fair and accurate, much like everything else I have read on the iwf site. This statement I thought was key right here.
"IWF is concerned, however, that poorly designed studies raise issues too serious to ignore. Studies based on flawed techniques can readily create an appearance of discrimination where none exists. This may lead to policies lacking any legitimate basis––as well to an atmosphere of ill will not justified by facts. While some women may reap short-term benefits from such outcomes, IWF believes that, in the long term, both sexes will be harmed. "
Please do not call these women "true feminists" I dont want it catching on. They are are bright, intelligent, independant and considerate women. They are concerned about women and women's economy thats their job, but they have gone the moral high road and have taken into consideration the effects of their studies on men and the benifit of men and the good that men provide to the world. These are educated women with a good heart. This is a picture of one of my personal favorites. http://www.eppc.org/images/staff/largephoto/cslarg e.jpg
The fight for vigelance is eternal, don't let hate groups like the n-o-w promote discimatative legislation, dont let them stack the deck in their favour. They have opperated under the radar for far to long.
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Wednesday June 19, @12:39AM EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Hail Scott.
Thanks for the heads up.
Here's a copy of my letter to my US senators.
----------------------------------
TO: My U.S. Senators: Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray
It seems to me that not having enough judges on the
federal bench is slowing justice and infringing on
every American's safety, freedom and civil rights.
This is a "bad thing"(TM).
I've read that the reason WHY the Senate isn't
confirming judges is because of feral hen-pecking by
NOW and other radical special interest feminist
groups.
If this is true, it seems to me that not confirming is
doubly bad. In addition to slowing justice, it's
politicizing the federal bench, which as you know
should be impartial and fully staffed.
Please confirm the judges nominated to the federal
bench!
Thanks,
Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I believe that we not only have a problem with regard to the appointment of judges who are not politcally biased in favor of women and/or any other ethnic, religious, national, or political group. We, also, have a problem with regard to the admission to law school because of the aforementioned. Subjective and non-relevant factors such as race, gender, socio-political status, class back ground, and perceived conformity to political and socio-cultural and politically correct standards seem to be paramount both as to admissions to law schools and the grading within the same. The same promulgates corruption within our legal system and our society in general. Laws should be passed and enforced which forbid the same.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
