Upcoming Constitutional Challenge to CA Custody/Child Support Laws

	posted by Scott on Saturday June 08, @08:15PM from the divorce dept.
	jigme writes, "A Constitutional Challenge directly attacking the Child Support Laws practices, policies and procedures in the State of California will be held at the San Francisco Superior Court, Friday, June 14th, 2002 at 12 Noon at 400 McAllister Street in San Francisco. This Challenge is going all the way up to the United States Supreme Court. The main Constitutional Challenge will be joined by more than 50 Fathers by JOINDER and/or Intervention. We clearly see the whole system as a fraud and will be holding a news conference with the mainstream media as well as having 1000 fathers protest at this event. If you would endeavor to participate, please call us at 925-363-5470 or 925-449-8436. E-mail livebeatdad2(at)msn.com or petedclark(at)hotmail.com or jigcho(at)webtv.net.

<  U.S. Army Funds Domestic Abuse Study On Women Only | Men's Health Special Report Focuses on Global Issues  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Men's Hour interview (Score:2, Informative) by Raymond Cuttill on Sunday June 09, @01:16AM EST (#1) (User #266 Info) There's an interview with Richard Pitchers about the Californian Constitutional Challenge (Friday June 14th 12pm at Supreme Court, San Francisco) on the current Men's Hour. See www.menshour.com

Be Careful with this Group (Score:2) by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Monday June 17, @11:08AM EST (#2) (User #643 Info) I read the constitutional challenge by this group and found what I believed what white supremacist language. It is groups like this one that give the men's movement a bad name. For example, there was language asserting how he is a white male not subject to the 14th amendment. No self-respecting judge will read past the first page of this group’s ranting. Dang. I looked for the link to the text of the lawsuit but cannot find it right now. IMHO Live Beat Dads is just a KKK group remade with a new face. Disclaimer: My statements are intended to be personal opinion, belief, sarcasm, or allegation.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]