[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Harvard Increases Standards of Evidence in Rape and Other Cases
posted by Scott on Thursday May 30, @05:17PM
from the false-accusations dept.
False Accusations scott sager pointed me to this article by Cathy Young in Reason Magazine. Young reports that Harvard is increasing the standards of evidence in order to open administrative investigations for various offenses, including rape. Harvard is the last place I thought this would start, but could this be a signal that the tide could be changing at colleges and universities? We can certainly hope.

Source: Reason [magazine]

Title: Unwanted Sex: A turning tide on date rape

Author: Cathy Young

Date: May 14, 2002

CA Assembly Rushes to Vote on Sabotaged Paternity Fraud Bill | MANN Downtime Tonight  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Evidence (Score:2)
by Thomas on Thursday May 30, @05:25PM EST (#1)
(User #280 Info)
Harvard has adopted a new policy under which sexual assault complaints will be investigated by the school's administrative board only if there is some corroborating evidence.

They're actually going to require evidence.
Re:Evidence (Score:1)
by cshaw on Monday June 03, @07:20AM EST (#4)
(User #19 Info)
I've been to the Harvard Campus. It is refreshing to see that this school has deceided to follow what are considered judicial norms with regard to allegations of sexual misconduct.
CA Assembly Vote Tally (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Thursday May 30, @07:50PM EST (#2)
It is especially interesting to note that the Chair of the Committee of Judiciary (Corbett) opposed the bill. I wonder what her official statement would be?

*******************************************

        VOTES - ROLL CALL
MEASURE: AB 2240
AUTHOR: Wright
TOPIC: Paternity testing.
DATE: 05/28/2002
LOCATION: ASM. FLOOR
MOTION: AB 2240 Wright Assembly Third Reading
        (AYES 57. NOES 3.) (PASS)
                (21 not voting)

        AYES
        ****

Aanestad Alquist Ashburn Bates
Bogh Briggs Calderon Bill Campbell
John Campbell Canciamilla Cardenas Cardoza
Chavez Cogdill Cohn Correa
Cox Daucher Dickerson Dutra
Florez Harman Havice Hertzberg
Hollingsworth Horton Keeley Kehoe
Kelley La Suer Leach Leonard
Longville Maddox Maldonado Matthews
Mountjoy Nakano Robert Pacheco Rod Pacheco
Papan Pescetti Reyes Richman
Runner Salinas Steinberg Strickland
Thomson Vargas Washington Wayne
Wiggins Wright Wyland Zettel
Wesson

        NOES
        ****

Corbett Jackson Wyman

        ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING
        *********************************

Aroner Cedillo Chan Chu
Diaz Firebaugh Frommer Goldberg
Koretz Leslie Liu Lowenthal
Migden Nation Negrete McLeod Oropeza
Pavley Shelley Simitian Strom-Martin


Re:CA Assembly Vote Tally (Score:2)
by Marc Angelucci on Thursday May 30, @09:45PM EST (#3)
(User #61 Info)
The Chair wrote very biased analyses and did more harm to this bill than any other individual in my opinion. I'm hoping in the Senate we can gain back some of the losses. Thanks for posting this. But is this on the wrong thread?
[an error occurred while processing this directive]