This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's eerie is that, save for the use of a few outdated terms, this article could easily have been written yesterday. I think it dispels the notion that such arguments about men being, in certain ways, more "oppressed" is a claim that could only have been credible in the past 10 years or so, but certainly not credible in 1970.
The basic conclusion I draw from this piece is that feminism was (and is) a largely superfluous religion conceived by opportunistic fanatics who hijacked a social revolution that would probably have occurred with or without their influence (albeit less dramatically).
I prefer to steer clear of the question as to which sex has it "harder", since I think it's entirely a matter of personal opinion as to what constitutes as a preferable lifestyle. Is it better to be public property, or private property (if one must be property at all)? Is it better to devote your life to taking care of only your own home and family, or make a more public contribution which benefits many people's homes and families? Is it better to aggress, or to submit?
Ultimately, these are all questions which each of us can only answer for ourselves, and we should avoid projecting our own values and opinions onto subsets of the population with whom we share common genetic traits.
(And this concludes today's sermon!) ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|