This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This link talk about the same subject
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/30/opinion/30SUN2.h tml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday October 01, @12:41PM EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I have my own reservations about designer babies, but say you want to have a kid, and you know you or your spouse carries a sex-linked genetic trait for a deadly, or just plain horrifying, illness. You know that if you have a boy (or a girl), that child has a definite or very good chance of being born with this disease.
*I* say such a couple should adopt, but then again, I think the world is overpopulated and everyone should adopt. However, the world doesn't revolve around my opinions. If such a couple is going to have a bio kid, I think it's *moral* to choose to have a child of the gender where the phenotypic expression of this trait won't occur (that means that, while they may carry the gene, they won't develop the disease...heh, I'm studying genetics right now).
So, I don't think this technology is a completely bad thing. I don't think we should totally prohibit people from using this, but any ethical doctor will choose to put limitations on its use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice that the article specifically addresses NON-MEDICAL selection of sex.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|