[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Double Standards in Prisons
posted by Scott on Saturday May 05, @09:24AM
from the inequality/double-standards dept.
Inequality In Canada, The Cross Gender Monitoring Project has recommended that male prison guards be removed from women's prisons, for the protection of women's privacy concerns. While the problems of sexual harassment by the staff of the prisons was investigated, it was found that male prison guards were rarely involved in these cases. But in 1993 the Canadian Supreme Court also decided that male inmates who objected to female prison guards frisking them were not important, since ""Imprisonment necessarily entails surveillance, searching and scrutiny. A prison cell is expected to be exposed and to require observation." In other words, when men commit crimes, they lose their right to privacy." Donna Laframboise examines this double standard in her National Post column. Thanks to Rand for the link.

Source: National Post [Canadian newspaper]

Title: Double standard behind bars

Author: Donna Laframboise

Date: May 3, 2001

Fatherhood Legislation | Sexual Harassment of U.S. Senate Male Staff  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Same in the US (Score:2)
by Marc Angelucci on Sunday May 06, @10:13PM EST (#1)
(User #61 Info)
I have cases showing almost the exact same decisions in California Courts. Even though a number of male inmates complained that female guards joked about the men's bodies and genetalia while they watched the men shower, the courts found it OK to have female guards in male prisons but not the reverse.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]