|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is gender apartheid and state sponsored terrorism and violence.
The only reports I've read of the rates of girls and boys slapping each other in schools have girls hitting boys at about 20 times the rate boys hit girls. (Both of the reports were informal but they both ended up with this 20:1 figure; if anyone knows of a formal study on this I'd like to hear about it). Why do girls slap boys far more often? Because they know they can get away with it. Only boys are punished, even if they only defend themselves.
Of course kids slapping each other isn't a serious issue, but these girls are being taught they can manipulate the system. They can tell a boy to his face "I can hit you but you can't hit me", and the boys know its true too. These girls grow up knowing the system can be manipulated (eg. by false accusations) if you are of the right sex.
America locks away more of its citizens than any other country. I beleive that may be true even by proportion to its population, it certainly locks away far more than other Western countries by proportion. The vast majority are men. One in four men in the US will spend at least one night incarcerated. Mostly without being convicted of anything. While emprisoned they will be subject to anal rape, which the state turns a blind eye to and doesn't even bother to estimate the rate of. Unofficial estimates by the SPR place the rate of male rape far higher than the rate of rape of women in the US.
At the same time as this story came out I hear (from the Tonight Show with Jay Leno -- haven't managed to confirm this yet) that Swissair have now said their air stewardesses can slap a male passenger who makes sexually suggestive comments. This sort of double standard is easy to find of course. I remember n interview in Jack Kammer's "Good Will Towards Men" where a feminist director of a domestic violence shelter is said to have admited she slaps her male partner around sometimes "but it doesn't matter because he's a man".
Feminism has deliberately encouraged this sort of violence against grown men. They are just not as worthy as sympathy in the eyes of the media, as a 14 year old boy. The injustice is not so glaring. We are more likely to believe "they must have done something". How can any rational person say that the violence of the system against this 14 year old boy, does not far FAR exceed anything he is even accused of?
If an individual were to kidnap someone and lock them up, possibly analy raping them on a daily basis, would we have any problem seeing it as an act of extreme violence? What changes when the state does it? Most Nazi violence was state endorsed. When feminists insist on state sponsored terrorism against men, it IS advocacy of violence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Sunday December 24, @04:09PM EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Adam H here,can't agree with you more dave.BTW informal estimates put one third of those in prison as fathers in comtempt of count charges and one third of them as non-violent drug offences.Have you considered submitting an essay to mensactivism? we could have it as our feature you know :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to news reports, this is the man who has tried to have a fourteen-year old boy prosecuted for a playful light slap. If this is true, then I would like to know why he is not being investigated by his superiors.
I believe that it is almost certain that he will have connections to the covert matriarchal political party known as the feminists. If this is so, then he is using the law as a political tool to attack young boys (who are representitives of "the Patriarchy" - according to the feminists) This is intolerable - especially at a place of education.
I suggest that he be removed from his position of having power over young boys.
He should be fired.
If he is indeed a feminist infiltrator, then he is there to harm boys - not help them!
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
