|
I recognize that some people may think I'm promoting a double standard when it comes to statutory rape - after all, I have posted stories which rail against the leniency of sentencing and the like when boys are victims of statutory rape.
My personal view is that I'd like a clear, enforced standard when it comes to this issue. Either: when the sex can be proven to be consensual, whether it was with an adolescent boy or girl, that statutory rape cannot be charged, or, statutory rape is charged in any case involving sex with a minor and a standard sentence is enforced with few exceptions (and certainly none based on gender).
I personally lean toward the latter standard, but the individualistic part of me sympathizes with the former, as I recognize that situations such as with these Latino families, that "statutory rape" can have nothing to do with sexual predators, which is what I believe the law was created to protect against.
Scott
|
|
|