How To Overthrow The New Master Race: Western Women

Link here. Excerpt:

'The Western man has achieved great wealth, intellectual attainment, technological advancement, medical breakthrough, and the highest status in the world at breakneck speed in the modern era.  But as all good things must come to an end, the Western man is drifting quickly towards the edges of the whirlpool due largely to his own actions.

Historians will debate the reasons for this inevitable fall.  I put it to you that chief among them was the willful abdication of the Western man’s preeminent status in favor of the Western woman.

Little did these men understand that female nature, at its core, employs the strategy of obtaining “MORE” to the point where men have now become dispossessed of the pinnacle of social power.  The Western woman sits atop this pinnacle and is now the most privileged, exalted, coddled, empowered, shielded, and defended demographic group in the world while the Western man is her minion.  Some evidence of the problem is as follows.
...
NEVER HELP A WOMAN FOR ANYTHING UNLESS SHE IS A FAMILY MEMBER OR A SEXUAL PARTNER

Treat all other women as if they are on their own when they are in a pickle. Pass by the woman with a flat tire. Never intervene on behalf of a woman in your personal life. Treat them as if they are on their own.

NEVER EMPLOY WOMEN BEYOND CLERICAL, CUSTOMER SERVICE OR SUPPORT ROLES

Although this practice can be legally challenged, clever employers know that spending a little on legal defense early can prevent years of huge costs later.

END ALL PLATONIC FRIENDSHIPS WITH WESTERN WOMEN

Women, unless they are sleeping with you, are to be treated as the enemy which wants to exploit you for whatever money, attention, and services you can provide. See women purely as providers of sex and children only. If you want to have platonic friendships with women, do so outside of Western society where women still respect men as leaders.

VOTE IN EACH AND EVERY FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL ELECTION BUT NEVER AGAIN VOTE FOR A FEMALE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES

It has been said that “Elections are less about voting for someone and more about voting against someone else.”

FILE OFFICIAL GRIEVANCES, COMPLAINTS, AND LAWSUITS AGAINST WOMEN WHENEVER YOU CAN AS A PURE ACT OF WAR

Women rule the roost in Western institutions, so these actions go a long way towards changing discriminatory attitudes towards men in favor of women.

TRAVEL TO AND DEVELOP COMFORT IN NON-WESTERN COUNTRIES

And increasingly invest and spend your wealth there as an act of defiance. Starving the West of male consumption revenue will hasten the economic demise of female supremacy and leave it vulnerable to overthrow from within or from without.

WHEN THE ISLAMIST OR MIGRANT UPRISING GOES INTO FULL TILT IN THE WEST, REFUSE TO FIGHT IT AND JUST LET IT BE.

Hostile outside forces are the means to re-masculinizing the West. Use these enemies of your enemy to do your dirty work for you because when it is all said and done, Western men will rise to the top in any male-dominated society.'

Like3 Dislike0

Comments

Ok, talk about your extreme responses. I can't say I am down with the author's plan of action here. But what this article represents itself is significant.

20 years ago such an article was unthinkable. No one wrote these kinds of things. But between false accusations and the war on masculinity itself, such a piece is at least thinkable in that you may expect someone to write it.

It's a sign more than anything else of just how much has changed.

Like2 Dislike0

I find a lot of wisdom in the suggestions offered in this article despite the fact that some of them strike me as being unnecessarily masochistic. As it is men are already at a severe disadvantage in our culture and feeling the pain of that discrimination daily. Why add to our own suffering?

(You will note in these comments that I use the term “female” as opposed to “woman” or “women”. Over time I’ve come to the realization that anything with a vagina and ovaries is “female” but it takes something considerably deeper and more innate to make a female a “woman”. “Woman” isn’t a term I use very often anymore…)

This article got me thinking what steps I have taken when it comes to “fighting to overthrow the new master race” (which, by the way, I do find a bit dramatic).

Now, as far as never helping a female who isn’t a relative or a sexual partner is, I think, great advice and, sadly, I have also adopted this mindset when it comes to helping children for obvious reasons. My single exception to this will always be those who are my mother’s age or older (the number of which decline substantially as I age myself).

It was while I was still in high school (I’m beyond “mid-life” right now) when I realized that I’d yet to have met a female that I would have wanted as a supervisor. Since, in over thirty years of experience, my opinion hasn’t changed I find the notion of never employing females outside of clerical, customer service or support roles as more than sensible.

Along those same lines I do not patronize establishments that tout themselves as being “women run” or “women owned” businesses. Furthermore, I will not purchase merchandise or non-essentials from companies that give percentages of their income to “breast cancer awareness” organizations and I regularly contact those companies and inquire as to whether they have the same program set up for “prostate cancer awareness” since I am a prostate cancer survivor. Need I tell you that I’ve never had a “yes” answer to that question.

I will say that although I don’t plan to begin ending platonic relationships with Western females I do only maintain those “relationships” - if you can call them that - when they are of significant benefit to me and cost me less in time or energy (and never more than pocket change in money) than I’m investing. Why cut off your nose to spite your face? As for new friendships with Western females? I’ve got plenty of friendships, no thank you.

I’m proud to say that I did this during this year’s May elections my vote was reserved solely for male candidates without exception. I do wonder, though, what I’d do if there were no men running for an office in any given election - especially a Presidential one.

As for the filing official grievances, complaints and lawsuits against females whenever you can and traveling to and developing comfort in non-Western countries I think these are, in theory, excellent suggestions but highly impractical for about 98% of modern men if only because such endeavors are guaranteed to be financially prohibitive and time consuming and it is still, after all, men that make this country work.

With regard any future Islamist and migrant uprisings see suggestion 1.

It is, I think, terribly sad that [the vast majority of] females in this country have apparently been so ignorant of and lax in their recognition of the quiet power they once held in the palms of their hands while acting as mothers, nurturers, moral guides and caregivers in and to our culture. The result has been what seems to be irreparable damage to the very fabric of our society.

They have surrendered their positions of strength to a cadre of reckless extremists and have allowed those vile misandrists to speak on their behalf. They adopted the same mindless platitudes vomited forth by the misfits to which they surrendered their powers and have embraced the delusion that only now are they “strong” and “independent” while having no apparent idea whatsoever what those words mean. Certainly this is evidenced by the “I stand with …” and “Me too” crazes taking our country by storm. When “victimization” or “sacrifice” necessitates an audience, the potential for financial gain and the oxymoronic insistence that one is a “strong victim” what truly exists are are not victims but more victimizers. Popular “victimization” (and it IS popular) isn’t victimization at all - its a self-aggrandizing activity that results in the belittling of those who really have suffered and will genuinely suffer at the hands of thugs, leeches and monsters of both sexes. And that is not strength - its vile to an extreme.

Like2 Dislike0

Humans are inherently very social animals. A huge part of our socialization is ALL about sex: the act itself and sexual identity. If 90% of the human experience is social (maybe closer to 99%+%) then at least 90% of that is sexualized.

Humans value each other based on their social positions. Remember high school? It gets different is all. But the basic things don't change. Ppl are valuable bc of their social position. Doubt me? Remember the Nazis? Members of groups villified by the Nazis had their lives devalued to the point they could be murdered with impunity. Social standing very often decides life and death questions. Further example: is a private or a general more likely to die in war? The private, of course. His rank is a social position. So is the general's. Their positions decide who lives and who dies.

Women used to be highly valued by men in modern society. They were seen as morally superior as a class to men, if generally less competent in practical matters. They were coveted as mothers. They were appreciated as sex partners though to discuss their behavior as such was considered rather gauche behavior even among most men. Time was, if a man spoke of a woman's sexuality in a raw way, a complete stranger might feel justified in chastising him to the point of blows, even if the woman was unknown to him. Women as a class were valued by men -- nearly worshipped.

Today, that is past. The feminine mystique has indeed been crushed. A lot of men now view women as being useful little better than as fuck-toys. Oh, they may be smart, successful, educated... but so what? What's all that to a man? Nothing. Of what actual use/relevance is a woman to a man these days, esp. if having kids with her is a no-go? She's good only for fucking and dumping by the roadside. Vice President of Finance? Good for her. But so what. Not like it's too relevant unless I'm looking for a job in her dept. Does she fuck? No? Well, not too soon anyway? She has no value to me.

If feminism sought to increase the value of women in society, among other things, it's had the opposite effect. Oh, women may value each other and themselves more in novel ways, sure. But the other half of society?

The other half is developing androids to replace them entirely in our lives, at least outside work. For now. Once AI is far enough along, most of us'll be working for an android one day... assuming we're working at all.

Life is ironic indeed.

Like0 Dislike0