Criminalizing Male Sexuality

Article here. Excerpt:

'Male sexuality is becoming illegal. Women are abusing their sexual power, and via feminism, are setting up all male sexual behavior as potentially criminal.

As any biologist will confirm, females control mating. Females have more to lose if they make a bad choice, so they are choosier and require more conditions. Women make the rules and they make them in their favor. There is no way men would have built the current human mating system. Men must do all initiating, men must pay for everything, men must get on one knee and beg, men must offer an expensive ring, and men must pay alimony after the divorce. There may be a biological basis for this, but this system is completely unacceptable in an egalitarian society. As feminists often claim, biology is not destiny. Yet, feminists have done everything to ensure that women continue to hold sexual power and control mating. They have hypocritically done this while demanding that men give up their traditional economic and political powers. As Michael Aaron puts it: “Third-wave feminism, … isn’t really aiming for shared power, but rather a monopoly on power—sexual power, to be specific.”

Feminists have long stated that heterosexual sex is men raping women. And the law and society are, bit by bit, agreeing. Feminists are trying to destroy heterosexual sex. Heterosexual sex is becoming criminal, at least, for men. There are an ever-increasing number of ways women can potentially accuse men of sexual violations. Consider this quote from two Harvard law professors: “Indeed, the concept of sexual misconduct has grown to include most voluntary and willing sexual conduct.” Also, consider this quote from feminist Laura Kipnis: “The rules and the codes [on campuses] have been rewritten behind closed doors such that almost all sex can be charged as something criminal.” And think of all the things that have been taken away from men sexually over the last 40 years. Many behaviors that we expected men to perform 40 years ago are now criminal, or at least, punishable to some degree. Male sexuality is, more and more, becoming illegal. Criminalizing all male sexual behavior is the ultimate example of women abusing their sexual power, as well as their new-found political power.'

up
56 users have voted.
I like this

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

ZPG

Remember the group ZPG, Zero Population Growth? They were a big thing in the 1970s. They made common cause with second wave feminists. That is because stopping people from procreating necessarily means stopping people from copulating. Feminists not only got behind ZPG for planetary health reasons but knew that male sexuality was already widely regarded as inherently opportunistic if not often predatory. Finding ways to criminalize male sexuality would, they reasoned, be easy enough if they could give TPTB a good enough reason. Putting the brakes on human reproduction was just the reason. BUT, who of the sexes would the focus be on? Naturally, as women produce the babies, restricting fecundity at the producing end makes sense. But feminists feared the implications: the focus would be on women to do what, get sterilized? This would imply compelling/encouraging women to alter their anatomies, contrary to the feminist goals of broadening freedoms and options for women, not restricting them.

This leaves only the procreating part to go after. Procreation requires men. It precedes production, yes, but heading it off would kill production. So how to do that? Compel male sterilization? Wouldn't work. Not enough men would submit to it and that pesky Constitution would stop it anyway.

Lacking further means, feminism, holding ZPG up as the rationale to TPTB, decided to go after the sex act itself. They do not concern themselves with male homosexuality because it isn't productive. But male heterosexualiy is.

And it fits in already so well with the other social justice movements. Perfect.

Thus they could sell making war on male heterosexuality to TPTB. They started in the 1970s and of course such a thing takes time. But like water dripping onto a stone, it's just a matter of WHEN the stone cracks.

So perhaps faster than they imagined, creating an environment where male sexuality is feared, condemned, and persecuted fits nicely in with the plan. They are well on their way.

As further evidence for my Feminist-ZPG Conspiracy idea, I point out that the ever-increasing progress being made by realistic sex doll/sex-bot technology heralded by the increasing rate at which same are being sold and made readily available in sex doll brothels in Asia and now in Europe is drawing nearly no commentary from feminists. And yet, sex-bot tech'y holds the potential to make human women far less valuable to men as sex partners than they have been historically. If feminists were really only about utilizing women's sexual power over men, they would arguably be flipping out at the recent developments around sex-bot tech'y. But they're quiet. This is bc sex-bot tech'y helps channel male sexual behavior to a non-productive end. And bc feminists are very much down with the ZPG agenda, they think it's good.

Personally, I think ZPG is the right idea. But I also think it can and should be done without criminalizing the male sex.

up
4 users have voted.
I like this

I'm not so sure about this part,

I'm not so sure about this part: "If feminists were really only about utilizing women's sexual power over men, they would arguably be flipping out at the recent developments around sex-bot tech'y. But they're quiet. This is bc sex-bot tech'y helps channel male sexual behavior to a non-productive end. And bc feminists are very much down with the ZPG agenda, they think it's good."

I am no expert on this, but from what I see, women do flip-out about a man using any way to sexually gratify himself that does not involve a woman. He is made fun of, thought of as a loser, unable to get a real woman, etc and they indicate that sex robots or sex toys just "prove" men only value women as sexual objects.

Where if a woman sexually gratifies herself without involving a man she is independent and liberated.

IMO, these are natural responses for the very reason you gave. Sexbots drive down the need for women. (I could repeat my ditty about lock and keys...)

up
4 users have voted.
I like this