The (very) mixed messages of the Women’s March against Trump

Article here. Excerpt:

'The Washington Post reports, “Of the 175,000 people who indicated they are going on the march’s Facebook page, just a fraction appear to be men,” which makes sense; it is the “Women’s March,” after all. But in this day and age, that which makes sense is usually problematic.

According to the Post, it’s “the same test that played out when Americans went to vote for the nation’s first female president,” and American men are once again failing.
...
Men are understandably confused. Esquire’s Luke O’Neil is here to help. O’Neil explained what men should do:

“Anyone with any degree of self-awareness may be hesitant to blunder his way into areas he wasn’t explicitly invited into, and there has been the regrettable emergence of a reviled archetype in recent years of the performative male feminist who espouses feminist talking points to enhance his own status . . . As a modest suggestion, men simply need to do two things at once: Speak up and keep your mouth shut.”'